Skip to main content

Truth-Maker Semantics for Some Substructural Logics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 26))

Abstract

Fine (J Philos Log 43:549–577, 2014) developed a truthmaker semantics for intuitionistic logic, which is also called exact semantics, since it is based on a relation of exact verification between states and formulas. A natural question arises as to what are the limits of Fine’s approach and whether an exact semantics of similar kind can be constructed for other important non-classical logics. In our paper, we will generalize Fine’s approach and develop an exact semantics for some substructural logics. In particular, we will provide a truthmaker semantics for the Non-associative Lambek calculus and some of its extensions. This generalization will reveal some interesting connections between Fine’s recent work on truthmaker semantics and his early work on relevant logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anglberger, A., Korbmacher, J., & Faroldi, F. (2016). An exact truthmaker semantics for permission and obligation. In O. Roy, A. Tamminga, & M. Willer (Eds.), Deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 16–31). College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E. W. (1956). Semantic construction of intuitionistic logic. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 19, 357–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezhanishvili, G., & Holliday, W. (2019). A semantic hierarchy for intuitionistic logic. Indagationes Mathematicae, 30, 403–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buszkowski, W. (1996). Categorial grammars with negative information. In H. Wansing (Ed.), Negation: A notion in focus (pp. 107–126). de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chartwood, G. (1981). An axiomatic version of positive semilattice relevance logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 46, 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. (1951). The weak theory of implication. In A. Menne, A. Wilhelmy, & H. Angsil (Eds.), KontrolIiertes Denken: Untersuchungen zum Logikkalkül und der Logik der Einzelwissenschaften (pp. 22–37). Kommissions-Verlag Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciardelli, I. Inquisitive semantics as a truth-maker semantics (Unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen, K. (1992). A brief survey of frames for the Lambek calculus. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 38, 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. (1976). Completeness for the semilattice semantics with disjunction and conjunction. Abstract in Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41, 560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. (2014). Truth-maker semantics for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43, 549–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. (2017). Truthmaker semantics. In B. Hale, C. Wright, & A. Miller (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 556–577). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, B. (2018). What makes true universal statements true? In P. Arazim & T. Lávička (Eds.), The logica yearbook 2017 (pp. 89–108). College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jago, M. (2020). Truthmaker semantics for relevant logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49, 681–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klev, A. (2017). Truthmaker semantics. Fine versus Martin-Löf. In P. Arazim & T. Lávička (Eds.), The logica yearbook 2016 (pp. 87–108). College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1965). Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic I. In J. N. Crossley & M. A. E. Dummett (Eds.), Formal systems and recursive functions (pp. 92–130). North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtonina, N. (1994). Frames and labels. A modal analysis of categorial inference (Ph.D. thesis). Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. (1958). The mathematics of sentence structure. The American Mathematical Monthly, 65, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. (1961). On the calculus of syntactic types. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics (Vol. XII, pp. 166–178).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F. (2018). An object-based truthmaker semantics for modals. Philosophical Issues, 28, 255–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M. J. (1998). Multimodal linguistic inference. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 5, 349–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punčochář, V. (2017). Algebras of information states. Journal of Logic and Computation, 27, 1643–1675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1938). Der Aussagenkalkül und die Topologie. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 31, 103–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A. (1971). Completeness of weak implication. Theoria, 37, 274–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A. (1972). Semantics for relevant logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 37, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. (1969). Facts and tautological entailments. The Journal of Philosophy, 66, 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y. (1997). A crash course in arrow logic. In M. Marx, L. Pólos, & M. Masuch (Eds.), Arrow logic and multi-modal logic (pp. 3–34). Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansing, H. (2007). A note on negation in categorial grammar. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 15, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of Ondrej Majer on this paper was supported by grant no. 16-07954J of the Czech Science Foundation.

The work of Vít Punčochář on this paper was supported by grant no. 17-15645S of the Czech Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vít Punčochář .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Majer, O., Punčochář, V., Sedlár, I. (2023). Truth-Maker Semantics for Some Substructural Logics. In: Faroldi, F.L.G., Van De Putte, F. (eds) Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29415-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics