Abstract
Material appearance is often represented by a bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF). Although the concept of the BRDF is widely used in computer graphics and related applications, the number of actual captured BRDFs is limited due to a time and resources demanding measurement process. Several BRDF databases have already been provided publicly, yet subjective properties of underlying captured material samples, apart from single photographs, remain unavailable for users. In this article, we analyzed material samples, used in the creation of the UTIA BRDF database, in a psychophysical study with nine subjects and assessed its 12 visual, tactile, and subjective attributes. Further, we evaluated the relationship between the attributes and six material categories. We consider the presented perceptual analysis as valuable and complementary information to the database; that could aid users to select appropriate materials for their applications.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Perceptual Attributes Analysis of Real-world Materials
- P. Brodatz. 1966. A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers (Brodatz Texture Database). Dover Publications.Google Scholar
- J. Filip, M. J. Chantler, P. R. Green, and M. Haindl. 2008. A psychophysically validated metric for bidirectional texture data reduction. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5 (Dec. 2008), 138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Filip and R. Vavra. 2014. Template-based sampling of anisotropic BRDFs. Comput. Graph. Forum 33, 7 (Oct. 2014), 91--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Filip, R. Vavra, and M. Havlicek. 2014. Effective acquisition of dense anisotropic BRDF. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’14). 2047--2052. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roland W. Fleming. 2014. Visual perception of materials and their properties. Vision Res. 94, 0 (2014), 62--75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. W. Fleming, R. O. Dror, and E. H. Adelson. 2003. Real-world illumination and perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision 3, 5 (2003), 347--368.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roland W. Fleming, Christiane Wiebel, and Karl Gegenfurtner. 2013. Perceptual qualities and material classes. J. Vision 13, 8 (2013), 9--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johannes Günther, Tongbo Chen, Michael Goesele, Ingo Wald, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2005. Efficient acquisition and realistic rendering of car paint. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Vision, Modeling, and Visualization (VMV’05).Google Scholar
- Andrew F. Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Measures 1, 1 (2007), 77--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Heaps and S. Handel. 1999. Similarity and features of natural textures. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 25, 2 (1999), 299.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. X. Ho, M. S. Landy, and L. T. Maloney. 2007. Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychol. Sci. 19 (2007), 194--204.Google Scholar
- ITU. 2008. ITU-R.REC.P.910. Subjective Audivisual Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- A. Jarabo, H. Wu, J. Dorsey, H. Rushmeier, and D. Gutierrez. 2014. Effects of approximate filtering on the appearance of bidirectional texture functions. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 20, 6 (June 2014), 880--892. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Keelan. 2003. ISO 20462: A psychophysical image quality measurement standard. In Proceedings of the SPIE (SPIE’03), vol. 5294. 181--189.Google Scholar
- B.-G. Khang, J. J. Koenderink, and A. M. L. Kappers. 2006. Perception of illumination direction in images of 3D convex objects: Influence of surface materials and light fields. Perception 35, 5 (2006), 625--645.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael S. Landy and Norma Graham. 2004. Visual perception of texture. In The Visual Neurosciences. MIT Press, 1106--1118.Google Scholar
- H. Long and W. K. Leow. 2002. A hybrid model for invariant and perceptual texture mapping. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1. IEEE, 135--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Malik and P. Perona. 1990. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 7, 5 (1990), 923--932.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephen R. Marschner, Stephen H. Westin, Eric P. F. Lafortune, and Kenneth E. Torrance. 2000. Image-based bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurement. Appl. Opt. 39, 16 (June 2000), 2592--2600.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodrigo Martín, Julian Iseringhausen, Michael Weinmann, and Matthias B. Hullin. 2015. Multimodal perception of material properties. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP’15). 33--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Matusik, H. Pfister, M. Brand, and L. McMillan. 2003. A data-driven reflectance model. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (2003), 759--769. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mojsilovic, J. Kovacevic, D. Kall, R. J. Safranek, and S. Kicha Ganapathy. 2000. The vocabulary and grammar of color patterns. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 3 (2000), 417--431. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Motoyoshi, S. Nishida, L. Sharan, and E. H. Adelson. 2007. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 447, 10 (2007), 206--209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Ngan, F. Durand, and W. Matusik. 2005. Experimental analysis of BRDF models. Eurograp. Symp. Render. 2 (2005), 117--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsburg, and T. Limperis. 1977. Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance. NBS Monograph 160 (1977), 1--52.Google Scholar
- S. Padilla, O. Drbohlav, P. R. Green, A. Spence, and M. J. Chantler. 2008. Perceived roughness of 1/f<sup>β</sup> noise surfaces. Vision Res. 48, 17 (2008), 1791--1797.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. C. Pont, P. Sen, and P. Hanrahan. 2007. 2½D texture mapping: Real-time perceptual surface roughening. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 69--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Ramanarayanan, J. Ferwerda, B. Walter, and K. Bala. 2007. Visual equivalence: Towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 76:1--76:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Ravishankar Rao and G. L. Lohse. 1996. Towards a texture naming system: Identifying relevant dimensions of texture. Vision Res. 36, 11 (1996), 1649--1669.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Schwartz and K. Nishino. 2013. Visual material traits: Recognizing per-pixel material context. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. 883--890. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Schwartz and K. Nishino. 2015. Automatically discovering local visual material attributes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’15). 3565--3573.Google Scholar
- Ana Serrano, Diego Gutierrez, Karol Myszkowski, Hans-Peter Seidel, and Belen Masia. 2016. An intuitive control space for material appearance. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 6, Article 186 (Nov. 2016). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lavanya Sharan, Ce Liu, Ruth Rosenholtz, and Edward H. Adelson. 2013. Recognizing materials using perceptually inspired features. Int. J. Comput. Vision 103, 3 (July 2013), 348--371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Tamura, S. Mori, and T. Yamawaki. 1978. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. 8, 6 (1978), 460--473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Midori Tanaka and Takahiko Horiuchi. 2015. Investigating perceptual qualities of static surface appearance using real materials and displayed images. Vision Res. 115 (2015), 246--258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. F. te Pas and S. C. Pont. 2005. A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres. In Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 57--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. F. te Pas and S. C. Pont. 2005. Estimations of light-source direction depend critically on material BRDFs. Percept., ECVP Abstract Suppl. 34 (2005), 212.Google Scholar
- P. Vangorp, J. Laurijssen, and P. Dutre. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 77:1--77:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Vanrell and J. Vitria. 1997. A four-dimensional texture representation space. In Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Vol. 1. 245--250.Google Scholar
- M. Vanrell, J. Vitria, and X. Roca. 1997. A multidimensional scaling approach to explore the behavior of a texture perception algorithm. Mach. Vision Appl. 9, 5/6 (1997), 262--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josh Wills, Sameer Agarwal, David Kriegman, and Serge Belongie. 2009. Toward a perceptual space for gloss. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 4, Article 103 (Sept. 2009), 15 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Perceptual Attributes Analysis of Real-world Materials
Recommendations
Three Perceptual Dimensions for Specular and Diffuse Reflection
Previous research investigated the perceptual dimensionality of achromatic reflection of opaque surfaces, by using either simple analytic models of reflection or measured reflection properties of a limited sample of materials. Here, we aim to extend ...
Perceptual rendering of participating media
High-fidelity image synthesis is the process of computing images that are perceptually indistinguishable from the real world they are attempting to portray. Such a level of fidelity requires that the physical processes of materials and the behavior of ...
Wavelet encoding of BRDFs for real-time rendering
GI '07: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007Acquired data often provides the best knowledge of a material's bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF). Its integration into most real-time rendering systems requires both data compression and the implementation of the decompression and ...
Comments