Prague Economic Papers 2011, 20(4):348-365 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.404

Determinants of Firm Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange

Zuzana Fungáčová1, Jan Hanousek2
1 Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT), Snellmaninaukio, PO Box 160, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland (zuzana.fungacova@bof.fi).
2 Charles University, CERGE-EI, Prague, Politických vězňů 7, 111 21 Prague 1, Czech Republic; Anglo-American University, Prague; CEPR; WDI. (jan.hanousek@cerge-ei.cz).

This research investigates the emergence of stock market in the Czech Republic. We use Czech mass privatization as an experiment that allows us to analyze under what conditions a viable stock market arises. On the Prague Stock Exchange (PSE), unlike its counterparts in Poland or Hungary, exceptionally large amounts of shares were delisted e.g. excluded from public trading soon after trading at this market began in 1993. We estimate the determinants of shares delisting analyzing the period 1993-2004. Using firm-level data on listed and delisted companies we show that it was possible to prevent massive delisting if certain pre-privatization and privatization characteristics of the companies had been taken into account when deciding which companies to place on the stock exchange for public trading following the mass privatization. This result has important implications for establishing stock markets in emerging economies.

Keywords: privatization, transition economy, stock market, delisting
JEL classification: G15, G28, P34

Published: January 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fungáčová, Z., & Hanousek, J. (2011). Determinants of Firm Delisting on the Prague Stock Exchange. Prague Economic Papers20(4), 348-365. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.404
Download citation

References

  1. Andrianova, S., Demetriades, P., Xu, Ch. (2008), "Political Economy Origins of Financial Markets in Europe and Asia." Discussion Papers in Economics 08/1, Department of Economics, University of Leicester. Go to original source...
  2. Angrist, J. D., Krueger, A. B. (2001), "Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments." Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): pp. 69-85. Go to original source...
  3. Atanasov, V., Black, B., Ciccotello, C. S., Gyoshev, S. B. (2010), "How Does Law Affect Finance? An Examination of Equity Tunneling in Bulgaria." Journal of Financial Economics 96(1): pp.155-173. Go to original source...
  4. Bakker, M., Gross, A. (2004), "Development of Non-bank Financial Institutions and Capital Markets in European Union Accession Countries." World Bank Working Paper No. 28. 27 Even though the developments in transition countries differed, besides the Czech Republic delisting took place in Bulgaria, Lithuania, and Slovakia. Go to original source...
  5. Bonin, J., Wachtel, P. (2003), "Financial Sector Development in Transition Economies: Lessons from the First Decade." Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 12(1): pp. 1-66. Go to original source...
  6. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (1995-2003), Transition Report, various issues.
  7. Gupta, N., Ham, J., Švejnar, J. (2000), "Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Theory and Evidence from the Czech Republic." William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 323. Go to original source...
  8. Egert, B., Kočenda, E. (2007), "Interdependence between Eastern and Western European Stock Markets: Evidence from Intraday Data." Economic Systems, 31(2), pp. 184-203. Go to original source...
  9. Fungáčová, Z., Hanousek, J. (2006), "A Castle Built on Sand: The Effects of Mass Privatization on Stock Market Creation in Transition Economies." Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition Discussion Paper 14/2006.
  10. Hanousek, J., Filer, R. (2000), "The Relationship between Economic Factors and Equity Markets in Central Europe." Economics of Transition 8(3): pp. 623-638. Go to original source...
  11. Hanousek, J., Filer, R. (2001), "Informational Content of Prices Set Using Excess Demand: The Natural Experiment of Czech Voucher Privatization." European Economic Review 45: pp. 1619-1646. Go to original source...
  12. Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E. (2010), "Learning by Investing: Evidence from a Naturally-Occurring Auction." Forthcoming in Economics of Transition.
  13. Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., Švejnar, J. (2009), "Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies." Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), pp, 699-728. Go to original source...
  14. Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E. (2008), "Potential of the State to Control Privatized Firms." Economic Change and Restructuring, 41(2), pp. 167-186. Go to original source...
  15. Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., Švejnar, J. (2007), "Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance in Firms after Privatization." Economics of Transition, 15(1), pp. 1-31. Go to original source...
  16. Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., Švejnar, J. (2009), "Divestitures, Privatization and Corporate Performance in Emerging Markets." Economics of Transition, 17(1), pp. 43-73. Go to original source...
  17. Hanousek, J., Podpiera, R. (2004), "Czech Experience with Market Maker Trading System." Economic Systems 28: pp. 177-191. Go to original source...
  18. Heckman, J. (1979), "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error." Econometrica 47, pp. 153-161. Go to original source...
  19. Kočenda, E., Valachy, J. (2002), "Firm Ownership Structures: Dynamic Development." Prague Economic Papers, 11(3), pp. 255-268. Go to original source...
  20. Kotrba, J. (1995), "Privatization Process in the Czech Republic: Players and Winners," in Švejnar J.: The Czech Republic and Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe, San Diego, London and Toronto: Harcourt Brace, Academic Press, pp. 159-198. Go to original source...
  21. Köke, J., Schröder, M. (2002), "The Prospects of Capital Markets in Central and Eastern Europe," ZEW Discussion Paper No. 02-57. Go to original source...
  22. Lieberman, I. W. (1997), "Mass Privatization in Comparative Perspective," in Lieberman I., Stilpon N., Raj D. (Eds.): Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, The World Bank and OECD. Go to original source...
  23. Mašek, F. (2005), "Ani rekordy vše neřeší (Records will not solve all the problems)." Ekonom 3/2005.
  24. Pop, D. (2006), "M&A Market in Transition Economies: Evidence from Romania." Emerging Markets Review 7, pp. 244-260. Go to original source...
  25. Prague Stock Exchange (1993-2005), Annual and Monthly Reports, various issues.
  26. Simoneti, M. (1997), "Regulating Post-privatization Securities Markets in Transition Economies," in Lieberman I., Stilpon N., Raj D. (Eds.), Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, The World Bank and OECD.
  27. The Economist (1991), "Giving Companies away is Better than Keeping them in State Hands." September 21, A18-A20.
  28. World Bank (1999), Czech Republic: Capital Market Review. The World Bank Washington, D.C. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.