Selective elimination/RNAi silencing of FMRF-related peptides and their receptors decreases the locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster
Introduction
Specific neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) produce and secrete peptides and biogenic amines. Some of these neuropeptides reach the target organ through the circulation and act as neurohormones while others remain within the CNS and modify the activity of other neurons as neuromodulators. Neuropeptides constitute a large group of signaling molecules. They influence many important processes of life in all Metazoans, like neurotransmission, nociception, feeding and metabolism, energy and osmotic homeostasis, learning and memory, etc. Insects as well use a plethora of neuropeptides to control and modulate physiological, developmental and behavioral events. The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, the genetically best known organism among the higher Eukaryotes, offers an excellent model system for studying the action mechanism of neuropeptides.
The availability of Drosophila genome sequence (Adams et al., 2000), has given a large impetus to the neuropeptide field as well: within a few years, many of the putative peptide and receptor genes have been identified in the fruitfly (Hewes and Taghert, 2007, Nässel and Winther, 2010. Bioinformatic approach predicted 119 peptide precursor genes in the Drosophila genome. Out of them, at least 42 genes may code for “prepropeptide” proteins containing one or more copies of identical and/or closely related peptide sequences flanked by proteolytic cutting sites. The peptidomic analysis has verified 46 neuropeptides which are derived from 19 of these precursor genes (Clynen et al., 2010).
Almost all the receptors which bind peptide ligands belong to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs represent one of the largest protein family, their genes comprise 1.5% of the Drosophila genome (Brody and Cravchik, 2000). Currently about 160 GPCRs are known in Drosophila, of which 44 are known to bind peptide ligands (Hewes and Taghert, 2007, Hauser et al., 2006a, Hauser et al., 2006b, Nässel and Winther, 2010). However, much less is known about the signaling pathways beyond the neuropeptide ligands and the cognate receptors.
The Drosophila Fmrf gene codes for a prepropeptide which contains six peptide sequences sharing the characteristic FMRF amino acid sequence at the C-terminus, and two other peptides with more divergent C-terminal sequences (Wegener and Gorbashov, 2008, Nässel and Winther, 2010). In addition to FMRF, neuropeptides derived from four other genes have the RF motif at their C-terminal end. Traditionally, these five neuropeptide genes are classified as the FMRF-related group (FaRP) comprising the Fmrf (CG2346), dromyosuppressin (Dms, CG6440), drosulfakinin (Dsk, CG18090), neuropeptide F (npf, CG10342) and short neuropeptide F (sNPF, CG13968) genes (Nässel and Winther, 2010, and Flybase (http://flybase.org). The Dms and npf genes code for one peptide each, while sNPF and Dsk code for five and three peptides, respectively. The DSK1 and DSK2 peptides have been verified biochemically, DSK0 is putative because it has not been confirmed as an expressed peptide. Interestingly, Palmer et al. (2007) recently found that the DSK0 peptide induced crop contractions. All these peptides have a conserved C-terminus with the terminal RF-amide sequence, and a divergent N terminus which could be responsible for the specific biological effects.
The FaRP peptides have characteristic myoactivities, but they are not related functionally: their target organs, effective thresholds, time-course and expression patterns are different (Nichols et al., 2002). Drosophila FMRF peptides generally stimulate muscle contraction in the heart, crop, foregut and body wall (Nichols, 2003. DMS is a myoinhibitory peptide decreasing e.g. the movement of the heart and adult foregut/crop (Kaminski et al., 2002). DSK peptides stimulate the contractions of the heart and crop (Nichols et al., 2002, Nichols et al., 2009), and increase larval locomotion activity and induces escape response (Chen et al., 2012). DSKs and their CCKLR receptors are required for the growth of the neuromuscular junctions (Chen and Ganetzky, 2012).
All the FaRPs are expressed in the CNS in neurons arranged in bilaterally symmetric patterns, which are characteristic for each neuropeptide (Santos et al., 2007, Park et al., 2008, Nässel and Winther, 2010). The FMRF peptides are expressed in the Drosophila CNS in 17 various cell types, in about 60 neurons (Schneider et al., 1991, Schneider et al., 1993). Even peptides which are derived from the same FMRF prepropeptide protein by differential processing can show different tissue-specific expression: the SDNFMRF, DPKQDFMRF and TPAEDFMRF peptides are expressed in similar patterns in the thoraco-abdominal ganglion, but TPAEDFMRF is additionally expressed in the adult lateral protocerebrum and the gut (Nichols et al., 1999). DMS is expressed in the CNS but could be detected by immuno-staining in the crop and gut (“brain-gut peptide”, McCormick and Nichols, 1993, Merte and Nichols, 2002 DSK is also expressed in the CNS (Nichols and Lim, 1996). DSK is expressed in some of the DILP (Drosophila insulin-like peptide)-producing neurons which have axonal connection to neurohemal areas in the corpora cardiaca, aorta and the anterior intestine. DILP and DSK together control the feeding behavior as hormonal satiety signals (Söderberg et al., 2012). NPF and sNPF are expressed both in the CNS and the midgut (Veenstra, 2009). sNPF is also expressed in several thousand CNS neurons and consequently exerts a broad spectrum of modulatory effects (Nässel et al., 2008).
The determination of the neuronal cell fate and the neuropeptide expression patterns in the CNS are regulated by specific enhancers binding transcription factors in the genes’ regulatory regions (Benveniste and Taghert, 1999, Vanden Broeck, 2001). Specification of the identity of single neurons in the CNS is a multistep process which builds up a combinatorial code of the activated enhancers (Baumgardt et al., 2007). GPCR receptors of the neuropeptides and neurohormones are expressed on a broader scale in the target cells and organs Cazzamali and Grimmelikhuijzen, 2002, Duttlinger et al., 2002, Nichols, 2003, Bendena et al., 2012).
The experiments described here address the effects exerted by some of the FaRP peptides (FMRF, DMS, DSK) and receptors on the locomotor activity of Drosophila adults. For this purpose, we used two genetic approaches (i) RNAi silencing of FMRF-related peptides and their receptors: and (ii) construction of new Fmrf-Gal4 drivers which represent specific parts of the FMRF spatial expression in the CNS, and their application to remove the corresponding neural cells by reaper (rpr)-induced apoptosis. The results showed that these treatments decreased the locomotor activity of the flies in general.
Section snippets
Drosophila strains
Drosophila stocks and crosses were maintained on standard cornmeal–yeast–agar medium. The experiments were performed at 25 °C. The RNAi stocks silencing the FaRPs and receptor genes were obtained from the VDRC Stock Center (Vienna, http://stockcenter.vdrc.at) and the NIGFly collection (Kyoto, http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp), their identification numbers are given in Table 1. The other mutant and balancer stocks were received from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (//flystocks.bio.indiana.edu
Construction of FMRF expression pattern-specific Gal4 drivers
Benveniste and Taghert (1999) described 5′ upstream DNA sequences regulating the spatial expression in the CNS of the Fmrf gene. When they cloned these DNA fragments into a vector upstream of the β-galactosidase gene, they found the staining pattern reproducing specific parts of the FMRF spatial expression. Based on this information, we amplified three such DNA sequences by PCR, cloned them into the pBPGUw vector upstream to the Gal4 coding sequence, and made transgenic Drosophila strains (
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Hungarian grants OTKA T75774 and partially by OTKA K104011 as well as by TAMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0012. The support for travel and subsidy expenses (2010–2012) by the Bilateral Research Agreement between the Hungarian and Czech Academy of Sciences is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are due to Drs. Frantisek Sehnal and Dalibor Kodrik (Biological Centre, CAS, České Budejovice) for scientific and mentoring support, Dr. Ferhan Ayaydin for his help in confocal
References (42)
- et al.
Evidence for postsynaptic modulation of muscle contraction by a Drosophila neuropeptide
Peptides
(2008) - et al.
The different effects of three Drosophila melanogaster dFMRFamide-containing peptides on crop contractions suggest these structurally related peptides do not play redundant functions in gut
Peptides
(2002) - et al.
A review of neurohormone GPCRs present in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster and the honey bee Apis mellifera
Prog. Neurobiol.
(2006) - et al.
Two different forms of arousal in Drosophila are oppositely regulated by the dopamine D1 receptor ortholog DopR via distinct neural circuits
Neuron
(2009) - et al.
Drosophila melanogaster myotropins have unique functions and signaling pathways
Peptides
(2002) - et al.
A comparative review of short and long neuropeptide F signaling in invertebrates: any similarities to vertebrate neuropeptide Y signaling?
Peptides
(2011) - et al.
Drosophila neuropeptides in regulation of physiology and behavior
Prog. Neurobiol.
(2010) FMRFamide-related peptides and serotonin regulate Drosophila melanogaster heart rate: mechanisms and structure requirements
Peptides
(2006)- et al.
The drosulfakinin 0 (DSK 0) peptide encoded in the conserved Dsk gene affects adult Drosophila melanogaster crop contractions
J. Insect Physiol.
(2007) - et al.
Cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of the Drosophila FMRFamide neuropeptide gene
Neuron
(1993)
Neuropeptides and their precursors in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster
Peptides
The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
Science
Specification of neuronal identities by feedforward combinatorial coding
PLoS Biol.
Select neuropeptides and their G-protein coupled receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster
Front. Endocrinol.
Cell type-specific regulatory sequences control expression of the Drosophila FMRF-NH2 neuropeptide gene
J. Neurobiol.
Drosophila melanogaster G protein-coupled receptors
J. Cell Biol.
Molecular cloning and functional expression of the first insect FMRFamide receptor
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
A neuropeptide signaling pathway regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila
J. Cell Biol.
Drosulfakinin activates CCKLR-17D1 and promotes larval locomotion and escape response in Drosophila
Fly (Austin)
Neuropeptide biology in Drosophila
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens
Nat. Methods
Cited by (14)
Sleep, Immunity, and Stress: Novel Insights From Drosophila
2019, Handbook of Behavioral NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Mammals, including humans, also express NPVF peptides, but their role in sleep has not been addressed. FMRFa in flies has been shown to be important for escape responses to stress (Kiss et al., 2013; Klose, Dason, Atwood, Boulianne, & Mercier, 2010). We proposed that, similar to zebrafish, FMRFa peptides are important for integrating sensory information with behavioral state (Lenz et al., 2015): an optimal escape response from environmental stress would enable animals to locate a preferred site that would facilitate sleep and recovery.
The 5-amino acid N-terminal extension of non-sulfated drosulfakinin II is a unique target to generate novel agonists
2016, PeptidesCitation Excerpt :Sulfakinins (SKs) are characterized by a C-terminal FDDYGH(M/L)RF-NH2, but unique N terminus. Sulfakinins are structurally similar to vertebrate cholecystokinin (CCK), both affect gut motility, heart rate, locomotion, and satiety [2,4,5,7–9,15,16,23–26]. They are encoded in polyproteins that undergo processing to yield multiple, structurally-related peptides with identity at the C terminus, but N-terminal extensions of varying structures and lengths [10,22].
FMRFamide signaling promotes stress-induced sleep in Drosophila
2015, Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityCitation Excerpt :The precise role of sNPF, which, Like FMRFa, is a member of the FaRP family (Nassel and Winther, 2010), remains uncertain since it has also been reported to serve a wake-promoting role (Chen et al., 2013). Previous studies have shown that FMRFamide signaling is involved in regulating larval escape responses to stress, as indicated by decreased activity of FR mutants during stressful stimuli (Kiss et al., 2013; Klose et al., 2010). As previously described for larvae, our experiments reveal the adult FRMB04659 mutants have a reduced waking activity during and after heat stress.
Species-specific duplicated FMRFaR-like gene A62 regulates spontaneous locomotion in Apolygus lucorum
2024, Pest Management ScienceEffects of Neuropeptide F and Its Receptor on Feeding, Growth and Reproductive of Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) with RNAi Technique
2022, Linye Kexue/Scientia Silvae Sinicae