Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(6): 791-820 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492

Setting Social Status in Couples and Partners' Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries

Jiří Večerník, Martina Mysíková
Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague

The conventional optics of social stratification research—in which the social position of the family unit is seen as being determined by the status of the male head of the household—have been challenged since the early 1970s. Similarly, economic research which views the household as a single unit has been questioned. Changing family circumstances and the increased share of couples in which the woman has higher earnings, education, and socioeconomic status mean that both these perspectives needs reformulating. The authors illustrate these issues using the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC) for five Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Austria) and draw on its 2006–2016 time series to present the characteristics of partners in couples and the relations between them. Female primacy has increased either in earnings, education, or socio-economic category in all countries except Hungary. The authors use the EU-SILC 2010 ‘Module on Intra-household Sharing of Resources’ to test the hypothesis that a direct link exists between partners’ social status split and separate welfare status, where female primacy in relevant characteristics is taken as a proxy for social status split, while separate welfare status is indicated by partners’ budgetary discretion. The hypothesis is confirmed for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, but not for Hungary and Poland. Apart from the personal factors of social status split, two family factors are strongly related to the probability of the budgetary discretion of couple partners across all countries: household income and marital status.

Keywords: social stratification, couples, status split, budgetary discretion, Central Europe

Published: December 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Večerník, J., & Mysíková, M. (2019). Setting Social Status in Couples and Partners' Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review55(6), 791-820. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492
Download citation

References

  1. Acker, J. 1973. 'Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism.' American Journal of Sociology 78 (4): 936-945, https://doi.org/10.1086/225411. Go to original source...
  2. Blau, P. M. and O. D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
  3. Blossfeld, H.-P. (ed.) 1995. The New Role of Women: Family Formation in Modern Societies. San Francisco, CA, Boulder, CO, and Oxford: Westview Press.
  4. Blossfeld, H.-P. and S. Drobnič. (eds) 2003. Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society: From Male Breadwinner to Dual Earner Families. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P. and S. Buchholz. 2009. 'Increasing Resource Inequality among Families in Modern Societies: The Mechanisms of Growing Educational Homogamy, Changes in the Division of Work in the Family and the Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model.' Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40 (4): 603-616, https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.40.4.603. Go to original source...
  6. Bourguignon, F. and P.-A. Chiappori. 1992. 'Collective Models of Household Behavior: An Introduction.' European Economic Review 36 (2-3): 355-364, https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90091-A. Go to original source...
  7. Carriero, R. and L. Todesco. 2018. 'Housework Division and Gender Ideology: When Do Attitudes Really Matter?' Demographic Research 39 (39): 1039-1064, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.39. Go to original source...
  8. Chiappori, P.-A. 1992. 'Collective Labor Supply and Welfare.' Journal of Political Economy 100 (3): 437-467, https://doi.org/10.1086/261825. Go to original source...
  9. Cianetti, L., J. Dawson and S. Hanley. 2018. 'Rethinking "Democratic Backsliding" in Central and Eastern Europe-Looking beyond Hungary and Poland.' East European Politics 34 (3): 243-256, https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1491401. Go to original source...
  10. Dale, A., G. N. Gilbert and S. Arber. 1985. 'Integrating Women into Class Theory.' Sociology 19 (3): 384-409, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038585019003004. Go to original source...
  11. Davis, S. N. and T. N. Greenstein 2009. 'Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.' Annual Review of Sociology 35 (1): 87-105, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920. Go to original source...
  12. Elsas, S. 2016. 'Income Sharing within Households: Evidence from Data on Financial Satisfaction.' Social Sciences 5 (3): 1-16, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5030047. Go to original source...
  13. Erikson, R. and J. H. Goldthorpe. 1992. Individual or Family? Results from Two Approaches to Class Assignment.' Acta Sociologica 35 (2): 95-105, https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939203500202. Go to original source...
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. European Commission. 2012a. 2010 EU‑SILC Module on Intra-Household Sharing of Resources. Assessment of the Implementation. Luxembourg: European Commission, Eurostat.
  16. European Commission. 2012b. The 2010 EU‑SILC Module on Intra-Household Sharing of Resources. Research Note 3/2012. Brussels: European Commission. Authors: I. Nagy, M. Medgyesi and O. Lelkes.
  17. European Commission. 2014. Special Eurobarometer 402. Undeclared Work in the European Union. Brussels: DGComm.
  18. European Parliament. 2018. Backlash in Gender Equality and Women's and Girls' Rights. Study requested by the FEMM committee. Authors: B. Juhász, E. Pap (with the assistance of national experts).
  19. Fraboni, R. and A. Vitali. 2019. 'Gender Differences in Couples' Matrimonial Property Regime in Italy.' Journal of Marriage and Family 81 (4): 885-904, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12574. Go to original source...
  20. Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. Cambridge: The Free Press.
  21. Gardes, F. and C. Starzec. 2009. 'Polish Households' Behavior in the Regular and Informal Economies.' Revue économique 60 (5): 1181-1210, https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.605.1181. Go to original source...
  22. Gauthier, A. H., I. E. Kotowska and D. Vono de Vilhena. (eds) 2018. 'Gender (In)Equality over the Life Course Evidence from the Generations & Gender Programme.' Population Europe Discussion Paper No. 10. Berlin: Population Europe.
  23. Goldthorpe, J. H. 1983. 'Women and Class Analysis: In Defence of the Conventional View.' Sociology 17 (4): 465-488, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004001. Go to original source...
  24. Grunow, D., K. Begall and S. Buchler. 2018. 'Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework.' Journal of Marriage and Family 80 (1): 42-60, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12453. Go to original source...
  25. Hajdu, G. and T. Hajdu. 2018. 'Intra-couple Income Distribution and Subjective Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Gender Norms.' European Sociological Review 34 (2): 138-156, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy006. Go to original source...
  26. Haller, M. 1981. 'Marriage, Women, and Social Stratification: A Theoretical Critique.' American Journal of Sociology 86 (4): 766-795, https://doi.org/10.1086/227316. Go to original source...
  27. Hamplová, D., C. Le Bourdais and É. Lapierre-Adamcyk. 2014. 'Is the Cohabitation-Marriage Gap in Money Pooling Universal?' Journal of Marriage and Family 76 (October): 983-997, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12138. Go to original source...
  28. Hanley, S. and M. A. Vachudova. 2018. 'Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.' East European Politics 34 (3): 276-296, https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457. Go to original source...
  29. Harrison, E. and D. Rose. 2006. ESeC User Guide. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
  30. Haugh, M. R. 1973. 'Social Class Measurement and Women's Occupation Roles.' Social Forces 52 (1): 86-98, https://doi.org/10.2307/2576426. Go to original source...
  31. Himmelweit, S., C. Santos, A. Sevilla and C. Sofer. 2013. 'Sharing of Resources within the Family and the Economics of Household Decision Making.' Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (3): 625-639, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12032. Go to original source...
  32. Klesment, M. and J. Van Bavel. 2015. 'The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Female Breadwinners in Europe.' Societies-and-Families Working Paper 26. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
  33. Křen, J. 2019. Čtvrt století střední Evropy: Visegrádské země v globálním příběhu let 1992-2017. (A quarter century of Central Europe. Visegrád countries in the global narrative of 1992-2017) Prague: Karolinum.
  34. Kuhar, R. and D. Paternotte. (eds) 2018. Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  35. Kulic, N., A. Minello and S. Zella. 2018. 'Manage Your Money, Be Satisfied? The Role of Income and Money Management Practices in the Financial Well-Being of Swiss Couples.' WP 2018/02. Florence: European University Institute.
  36. Law, H. and J. Sikora 2018. 'Gender Stratification and Feminist Sociology: Why East-Central Europe Needs More Quantitative Gender Stratification Research.' Fabrica Societatis 1 (1): 207-222.
  37. Lucchini, M., C. Saraceno and A. Schizzerotto 2007. 'Dual-Earner and Dual-Career Couples in Contemporary Italy.' Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 19 (3): 289-309. Go to original source...
  38. Lundberg, S. and R. A. Pollak. 1996. 'Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage.' Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 139-158, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.4.139. Go to original source...
  39. Machonin, P. 1970. 'Social Stratification in Contemporary Czechoslovakia.' American Journal of Sociology 75 (March): 725-741, https://doi.org/10.1086/224818. Go to original source...
  40. Maksymovych, S. 2017. 'Decision-making in the Household and Material Deprivation.' CERGE-EI Working Paper Series No. 604. Prague: CERGE-EI, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3042788. Go to original source...
  41. Mann, M. 1986. 'A Crisis in Stratification Theory?' Pp. 40-57 Gender and Stratification, edited by R. Crompton and M. Mann. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  42. Marshall, G., S. Roberts and C. Burgoyne. 1996. 'Social Class and Underclass in Britain and the USA.' British Journal of Sociology 47 (1): 22-67, https://doi.org/10.2307/591114. Go to original source...
  43. Mysíková, M. 2019. 'How Does "the Share of the Pie Matter"? European Empirics on the Financial Satisfaction of Partners.' Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics 67: 504-524.
  44. Oakes, J. M. and P. H. Rossi. 2003. 'The Measurement of SES in Health Research: Current Practice and Steps toward a New Approach.' Soc Sci Med 56 (4): 769-784, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4. Go to original source...
  45. Oláh, L. Sz., I. E. Kotowska and R. Richter. 2018. 'The New Roles of Men and Women and Implications for Families and Societies.' Pp. 41-64 in A Demographic Perspective on Gender, Family, and Health in Europe, edited by G. Doblhammer and J. Gumà. SpringerOpen, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72356-3_4. Go to original source...
  46. Plutzer, E. and J. F. Zipp. 2001. 'Class, Gender, and the Family Unit: A Dynamic Model of Stratification and Class Politics.' Social Science Research 30: 426-448, https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2001.0705. Go to original source...
  47. Scharle, Á. 2015. 'Attitudes to Gender Roles in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.' Study produced under grant agreement 'Growth-Innovation-Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe' of the EU FP7/2007-2013.
  48. Schwartz, A. (ed.) 2010. Gender and Modernity in Central Europe: The Austro-Hungarian Monarchy and Its Legacy. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
  49. Sewell, W. H. and R. M. Hauser. 1975. Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career. New York: Academic Press.
  50. Sik, E. 1992. 'From the Second to the Informal Economy.' Journal of Public Policy 12 (2): 153-175, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005092. Go to original source...
  51. Sik, E. 2009. 'From the Multicolored to the Black and White Economy. The Hungarian Second Economy and the Transformation.' International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18 (1): 46-70, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1994.tb00250.x. Go to original source...
  52. Večerník, J. 2011. 'Self-employment in the Czech Republic and CEE Countries: Persons and Households.' Post-Communist Economies 23 (3): 359-376, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2011.595128. Go to original source...
  53. Vitali, A. and B. Arpino. 2016. 'Who Brings Home the Bacon? The Influence of Context on Partners' Contributions to the Household Income.' Demographic Research 35 (41): 1213-1244, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.41. Go to original source...
  54. Vitali, A. and D. Mendola. 2014. 'The Emergence of Women as Main Earners in Europe.' ESRC Centre for Population Change. Working Paper 56, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2555172. Go to original source...
  55. Ward-Batts, J. 2008. 'Out of the Wallet and into the Purse: Using Micro Data to Test Income Pooling.' Journal of Human Resources 43 (2): 325-351, https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0005. Go to original source...
  56. Wesolowski, W. and K. Slomczynski. 1968. 'Social Stratification in Polish Cities.' Pp. 256-274 in Social Stratification, edited by J. A. Jackson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  57. Wise, R. and C. Zangger. 2017. 'Educational Homogamy and Inter-Couple Income Inequality: Linking Demographic and Socio-economic Consequences of Educational Expansion in Germany and Switzerland.' Swiss Journal of Sociology 43 (3): 587-610, https://doi.org/10.1515/sjs-2017-0029. Go to original source...
  58. Wright, E. O. 1989. 'Women in the Class Structure.' Politics & Society 17 (1): 35-66, https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700102. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.