Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2017, 53(1): 29-50 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.301

The Circle of Sociological Rationality: The Position of the Sociologist from a Hermeneutical Perspective

Martin Ďurďovič
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha

The aim of the article is to apply the concept of the hermeneutical circle to the position of a sociologist. The hermeneutical problem in sociology is exemplified by research into social action that examines how sociological understanding captures meanings attributed to the action by the actors themselves. Although several distinguished theorists have already introduced the idea of hermeneutics into sociology, none of them pursued the topic of the hermeneutical circle in detail. This article applies the hermeneutical circle to sociology through the concepts of 'pre-understanding' and the 'fusion of horizons'. The analysis results in the acknowledgement of epistemological pluralism in sociology and leads to the conclusion that the justification of truth in sociology cannot be simply a matter of correspondence-based verification, but must involve a form of decision-making about true knowledge within an intersubjective sociological rationality.

Keywords: hermeneutics, social action, rationality, epistemology, sociological theory

Published: February 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ďurďovič, M. (2017). The Circle of Sociological Rationality: The Position of the Sociologist from a Hermeneutical Perspective. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 53(1), 29-50. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.301
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675. Go to original source...
    2. Barnes, B. 1992. "Realism, Relativism and Finitism." Pp. 131-147 in D. Raven, L. Van V. Tijssen, J. de Wolf. Cognitive Relativism and Social Science. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Go to original source...
    3. Bauman, Z. 2010. Hermeneutics and Social Science. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    4. Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imaginery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    5. Boudon, R. 2011. Bída relativismu. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    6. Burawoy, M. 2007. "For Public Sociology." Pp. 23-64 in D. Clawson et al. Public Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. Go to original source...
    7. Burger, T. 1987. Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Durham: Duke University Press.
    8. Cicourel, A. V. 1964. Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
    9. Denzin, N. K., Y. S. Lincoln. 2003. "Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research." Pp. 1-45 in N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks - London - New Delhi: SAGE.
    10. Derrida, J. 1989. "Three Questions to H.-G. Gadamer." Pp. 52-54 in D. P. Mitchelfelder, R. E. Palmer (eds.). Dialogue and Deconstruction. New York: SUNY Press.
    11. Dilthey, W. 1981. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in der Geisteswissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    12. Ďurďovič, M. 2008. "Gadamerova hermeneutika a rozumějící sociologie." Filosofický časopis 56 (4): 509-531.
    13. Ďurďovič, M. 2013. "Hermeneutické aspekty Husserlovy fenomenologie." Filosofický časopis 61 (2): 207-228.
    14. Ďurďovič, M. 2014a. "Epistemologie a dělení kvantitativní a kvalitativní sociologie." Sociológia 46 (4): 351-372.
    15. Ďurďovič, M. 2014b. "Rozumění a jednání". Filosofický časopis 62 (1): 77-99.
    16. Ďurďovič, M. 2014c. "Hermeneutika a de(kon)strukce. Aliance, nebo protivenství?" Filosofie dnes 6 (1): 29-51.
    17. Feyerabend, P. K. 2001. Rozprava proti metodě. Praha: Aurora.
    18. Fajkus, B. 2005. Filozofie a metodologie vědy. Praha: Academia.
    19. Fleck, L. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago - London: University of Chicago Press.
    20. Gadamer, H.-G. 2010. Pravda a metoda I. Praha: Triáda.
    21. Gadamer, H.-G. 2011. Pravda a metoda II. Praha: Triáda.
    22. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnometodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    23. Geertz, C. 2000. Interpretace kultur. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    24. Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
    25. Giddens, A. 1986. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    26. Giddens, A. 1988. "Hermeneutics and Social Theory." Pp. 215-230 in G. Shapiro, A. Sica. Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects. University of Massachusetts Press.
    27. Gouldner, A. W. 2004. "Anti-Minotaurus: mýtus sociologie oproštěné od hodnocení." Teorie vědy 26 (4): 85-104.
    28. Grondin, J. 1997. Úvod do hermeneutiky. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
    29. Habermas, J. 1970. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    30. Habermas, J. 1971. "Der Universalitätsanspruch der Hermeneutik." Pp. 120-159 in K.-O. Apel. Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    31. Habermas, J. 1982. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    32. Hamilton, P. (ed.). 2003. Max Weber: Critical Assesments. London: Routledge.
    33. Havelka, M. 1998. "Max Weber a počátky sociologie náboženství." Pp. 13-115 in M. Weber. Sociologie náboženství. Praha: Vyšehrad.
    34. Heidegger, M. 1996. Bytí a čas. Praha: Oikoymenh.
    35. Hitzler, R., A. Honer. 1997. Sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik. Opladen: UTB, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11431-4. Go to original source...
    36. Husserl, E. 1996. Přednášky k fenomenologii vnitřního časového vědomí. Praha: Ježek.
    37. Hekman, S. J. 1986. Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    38. Kirkham, R. L. 1998. "Correspondence Theory of Truth." Pp. 8696-8698 in E. Craig. Routledge Encyklopedia of Philosophy. London - New York: Routledge.
    39. Kögler, H. H. 1996. The Power of Dialogue. Cambridge - London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    40. Kuhn, T. S. 1997. Struktura vědeckých revolucí. Praha: Oikoymenh.
    41. Kurt, R. 2004. Hermeneutik. Eine sozialwissenschaaftliche Einführung. Konstanz: UVK.
    42. Lavoie, D. (ed.). 1990. Economics and hermeneutics. London: Routledge.
    43. Lyotard, J.-F. 1993. O postmodernismu. Praha: Filosofia.
    44. Oliver, I. 1983. "The 'Old' and the 'New' Hermeneutic in Sociological Theory." The British Journal of Sociology 34 (4): 519-553, https://doi.org/10.2307/590937. Go to original source...
    45. Parsons, T. 2003. "Evaluation and Objectivity in Social Science: an Interpretation of Max Weber's contribution." Pp. 327-343 in P. Hamilton (ed.). Max Weber: Critical Assesments. London: Routledge.
    46. Popper, K. R. 1995. Život je řešení problémů. Praha: Mladá fronta.
    47. Reed, I. A. 2010. "Epistemology Contextualized: Social-Scientific Knowledge in a Postpositivist Era." Sociological Theory 28 (1): 20-39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01365.x. Go to original source...
    48. Reed, I. A., J. Alexander. 2009. "Social Science as Reading and Performance." European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 21-41, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099648. Go to original source...
    49. Ricoeur, P. 1986. Du texte à l'action. Paris: Seuil, https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782020093774. Go to original source...
    50. Ricoeur, P. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
    51. Ricoeur, P. 2005. "Vysvětlovat a rozumět". Reflexe 27.
    52. Rickert, H. 1926. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck.
    53. Rickert, H. 2007. Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Hildesheim: Olms-Weimann.
    54. Ringer, F. 1998. Max Weber's Methodology. London: Harward University Press. Go to original source...
    55. Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    56. Schleiermacher, F. 1977. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    57. Schütz, A. 1960. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Wien: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5948-4. Go to original source...
    58. Schütz, A. 1972. "Common Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action." Pp. 3-47 in A. Schütz. Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Go to original source...
    59. Soeffner, H.-G. 1989. Auslegung des Alltags - Der Alltag der Auslegung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    60. Stöckelová, T. 2012. Nebezpečné známosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    61. Špelda, D. 2009. Proměny historiografie vědy. Praha: Filosofia.
    62. Šrubar, I. 2007. Phänomenologie und soziologische Theorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    63. Thomson, J. B. 1981. Critical Hermeneutics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609176. Go to original source...
    64. Weber, M. 1998a. Metodologie, sociologie, politika. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
    65. Welz, F. 1996. Kritik der Lebenswelt. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97069-5. Go to original source...
    66. Windelband, W. 1921. "Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft." Pp. 136-161 in W. Windelband. Präludien. Tübingen: Mohr.
    67. Winch, P. 2004. Idea společenské vědy a její vztah k filozofii. Praha: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
    68. Wittgenstein, L. 1993. Filosofická zkoumání. Praha: Filosofia.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content