Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Food Self-Provisioning in Czechia: Beyond Coping Strategy of the Poor: A Response to Alber and Kohler’s ‘Informal Food Production in the Enlarged European Union’ (2008)

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food systems are of increasing interest in both research and policy communities. Surveys of post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) show high rates of food self-provisioning. These practices have been explained in terms of being ‘coping strategies of the poor’. Alber and Kohler’s ‘Informal Food Production in the Enlarged European Union’ (2008) offers a prominent account of this argument, supported by quantitative data. However, evidence from our case study of food self-provisioning in one CEE state–Czechia–contradicts their findings. Newly commissioned survey data, as well as a fresh look at the data they were working from, demonstrate that rather than being motivated by poverty, these widespread practices serve as a hobby and as a way of accessing ‘healthy food’. With food self-provisioning becoming an increasingly prominent subject in advanced industrial countries, in terms of both health and environmental policy, we propose that much greater care is taken in researching and interpreting the reasons for differences in food systems. Our findings are that environmentally sustainable and healthy self-provisioning in Czechia is motivated by a range of reasons, and practised by a significant proportion of the population across all social groups. This conclusion questions linear narratives of progress that figure ‘western’ practices as advanced or complete or automatically desirable, and contributes in a modest way to a decentring of narratives of progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Statistical significance of the group differences were tested by Tamhane Post Doc Test (Analysis of Variance, procedure ONEWAY from SPSS 15.0 statistical package). Differences referred as “statistically significant” in the text are significant at p<0.05 significance level.

  2. In the footnote attached to the second sentence they further explain that the test implication b) is valid “at least if we assume leisure time and the time cost of various recreational activities to be evenly distributed”.

  3. Data were collected by the Public Opinion Research Centre of the Institute of Sociology of the Academy of sciences of the Czech Republic (CVVM). Number of respondents: N = 1,024. Sampling method: quota sampling. Data are available through Sociological Data Archive of the Institute of Sociology (http://archiv.soc.cas.cz/en/ ).

  4. To compare incomes of households of different sizes and compositions we divided total household incomes by household size measured by ‘OECD-modified equivalence scale’ that assigns a value of 1 to the household head, value of 0.5 to each additional adult member and value of 0.3 to each child.

  5. Following Alber and Kohler we concentrate primarily on modeling the effect of income of food self-provisioning. The other independent variables serve us as only the control variables. In this article we are not interested in determining which independent variables are the most influential predictors of whether people are food self-provisioners or not. That is why we do not display full range of potential model results.

  6. Significantly positive value of unstandardised regression coefficient indicates increased likelihood of food self-provisioning in given category of respondents with respect to the reference category. Significantly negative value of unstandardised regression coefficient indicates decreased likelihood of food self-provisioning in given category of respondents with respect to the reference category.

References

  • Alber, J., & Kohler, U. (2008). Informal food production in the enlarged European Union. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, A. C. (2004). One hundred years of allotment gardens in Poland. Food & Foodways, 12, 247–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuus, M. (2004). Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehlička, P., & Smith, J. (2011). An Unsustainable State: Contrasting Food Practices and State Policies in the Czech Republic, Geoforum, 42(3), 362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehlička, P., & Smith, J. (2012). Shelf Life: Post-socialism, Food and the Politics of Sustainable Consumption. In R. Tyszczuk, J. Smith, N. Clark & M. Butcher (Eds.), Atlas: Geography, Architecture and Change in an Interdependent World (pp. 56–63). London: Black Dog Publishing.

  • Outhwaite, W., & Ray, L. (2005). Social theory and postcommunism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., & Tikhomirov, Y. (1993). Who grows food in Russia and Eastern Europe? Post-Soviet Geography, 34(2), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeth, H. T., Chachnov, S., & Surinov, A. (1998). Russian poverty: Muddling through economic transition with garden plots. World Development, 26(9), 1611–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Rochovská, A. (2007). Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives abd the geographies of post-socialist transformations. Geoforum, 38(6), 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Jehlička, P. (2007). Stories around food, politics and change in Poland and the Czech Republic, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(3), 395-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Špaček, O., & Šafr, J. (2010). Volný čas, sport a kulturní vkus: Rozdíly podle společenského postavení. In H. Maříková, T. Kostelecký, T. Lebeda, & M. Škodová (Eds.), Jaká je naše společnost? Otázky, které si často klademe… (pp. 81–99). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, A., & Hörschelmann, K. (2008). History, geography and difference in the post-socialist world: Or, do we still need post-socialism? Antipode, 40(2), 312–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Večerník, J. (2009). Czech society in the 2000s: a report on socio-economic policies and structures. Praha: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

Data Sources

  • Česká národní banka (Czech National Bank) (2011). Kurzy devizového trhu–měsíční kumulované průměry. Praha: Česká národní banka.

  • Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office) (2004). Příjmy, vydání a spotřeba domácností: statistiky rodinných účtů za rok 2003. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.

  • Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office) (2011a). Průměrná hrubá měsíční mzda–na přepočtené počty (podnikatelská, nepodnikatelská sféra). Prague: Czech Statistical Office.

  • Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office) (2011b). Vydání a spotřeba domácností: statistiky rodinných účtů za rok 2010. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Jiří Vinopal for advice concerning the construction of the Czech national survey questionnaire and the Public Opinion Research Centre (CVVM) in Prague for conducting the survey. We gratefully acknowledge research funding support from the Open University’s OpenSpace Research Centre, as well as from the Czech Science Foundation via grant No. 404/10/0521, entitled ‘Environmental Values, Beliefs and Behavior in the Czech Republic in Historical and International Perspective’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Jehlička.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jehlička, P., Kostelecký, T. & Smith, J. Food Self-Provisioning in Czechia: Beyond Coping Strategy of the Poor: A Response to Alber and Kohler’s ‘Informal Food Production in the Enlarged European Union’ (2008). Soc Indic Res 111, 219–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0001-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0001-4

Keywords

Navigation