Skip to main content
Log in

A new perspective on the sunshine duration variability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sunshine duration data is analysed here from a new perspective, different from the traditional ones. The study is focused on pairs of periods of shining sun (called clear periods) followed by periods with the sun covered by clouds (called dark periods). Their statistical and sequential properties are illustrated by using results obtained from satellite observations and ground measurements at Timisoara (Romania). Solar irradiance time series measured at ground are converted into a database consisting of pairs of clear/dark periods. These pairs are associated with three cloud classes derived from satellite observations: C1 (the sky is cloud-free), C2 (cloudy sky) and C3 (sky with semi-transparent or fractional clouds). The study was conducted by using tools from survival analysis. This is a novelty in sunshine duration analysis. Since information is missing during the night, the clear/dark period correlation was studied considering a censoring procedure (for all nine combinations of cloud types at the beginning of dark and clear intervals). Cox regression has been used to study the influence of covariates (such as extraterrestrial solar irradiance and sun elevation angle) on sunshine duration distribution. Results show that increase of extraterrestrial solar radiation tends to increase the risk of stopping any clear or dark interval, i.e. it tends to increase the variability in solar irradiance. Regardless of cloud class, stochastically shorter intervals are found for increasing sun elevation angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ångström A (1924) Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quart J Roy Met Soc 50:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu V (2015) Solar radiation estimation from cloudiness data. Satellite vs. ground-based observations. Int J Green Energy 12(8):852–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu V, Dumitrescu A (2014) Simple models to compute solar global irradiance from the CMSAF product Cloud Fractional Coverage. Renew Energy 66:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu V, Dumitrescu A (2016a) CMSAF products cloud fraction coverage and cloud type used for solar global irradiance estimation. Meteorog Atmos Phys 128(4):525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu V, Dumitrescu A (2016b) Simple solar radiation modelling for different cloud types and climatologies. Theor Appl Climatol 124(1-2):141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badescu V, Paulescu M (2011) Statistical properties of the sunshine number illustrated with measurements from Timisoara (Romania). Atmos Res 101:194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro S, Cannata G, Coppolino S, Sinagra E (1984) The reference frequency distributions of daily relative sunshine from different locations. Sol Energy 33:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabec M, Badescu V, Paulescu M, Dumitrescu A (2016) A new perspective on the relationship between cloud shade and point cloudiness. Atmos Res 172-173:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabec M, Paulescu M, Badescu V (2017) Statistical properties of clear and dark duration lengths. Sol Energy 153:508–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, London - New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrien M, Le Gleau H (2013) Algorithm theoretical basis document for “cloud products” (CMa-PGE01 v3. 2, CTPGE02 v2. 2 & CTTH-PGE03 v2. 2), available at:, SAF. NWC/CDOP/MFL/SCI/ATBD/01. http://www.nwcsaf.org/AemetWebContents/ScientificDocumentation/Documentation/MSG/SAF-NWC-CDOP2-MFL-SCI-PUM-01_v3.2.3.pdf. Accessed September 2019

  • Good E (2010) Estimating daily sunshine duration over the UK from geostationary satellite data. Weather 65:324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueymard C (2018) A reevaluation of the solar constant based on a 42-year total solar irradiance time series and a reconciliation of spaceborne observations. Sol Energy 168:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothe S, Good E, Obregon A, Ahrens B, Nitsche H (2013) Satellite-based sunshine duration for Europe. Remote Sens 5(6):2943–2972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave M, Reno MJ, Broderick RJ (2015) Characterizing local high-frequency solar variability and its impact to distribution studies. Sol Energy 118:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless JF (2002) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis AP, Katsoulis VD (2006) Sunshine duration hours over the Greek region. Theor Appl Climatol 83:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie RL, Paulin KJ, Bodeker GE, Liley JB, Sturman AP (1998) Cloud cover measured by satellite and from the ground: relationship to UV radiation at the surface. Int J Remote Sens 19(15):2969–2985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi R, Sabziparvar AA, Marofi S, Pak NAE, Heydari M (2015) Calibration of the Angström-Prescott solar radiation model for accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration in the absence of observed solar radiation. Theor Appl Climatol 119:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulescu M, Badescu V (2011) New approach to measure the stability of the solar radiative regime. Theor Appl Climatol 103:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulescu M, Stefu N, Calinoiu D, Paulescu E, Pop N, Boata R, Mares O (2016) Ångström–Prescott equation: physical basis, empirical models and sensitivity analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JA (1940) Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. T Roy Soc South Aust 64:114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Robaa SM (2008) Evaluation of sunshine duration from cloud data in Egypt. Energy 33:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth R (1988) Comparison of satellite and surface cloud cover observations and cloud cover regions over Europe. J Climatol 8:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salek M, Szabo-Takacs B (2019) Comparison of SAFNWC/MSG satellite cloud type with Vaisala CL51 ceilometer-detected cloud base layer using the sky condition algorithm and Vaisala BL-View Software. Atmosphere 10(6):316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemper M, Kaider A, Wakounig S, Heinze G (2013) Estimating the correlation of bivariate failure times under censoring. Stat Med 32:4781–4790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmetz J, Pili P, Tjemkes S, Just D, Kerkmann J, Rota S, Ratier A (2002) An introduction to Meteosat second generation (MSG). Bull Am Meteor Soc 83(7):977–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz J, Albert P, Behr HD, Caprion D, Deneke H, Dewitte S et al (2009) Operational climate monitoring from space: the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF). Atmos Chem Phys 9(5):1687–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solar Platform (2019) Solar platform of the West University of Timisoara, Romania. http://solar.physics.uvt.ro/srms. Accessed March 2019.

  • Spencer JW (1971) Fourier series representation of the position of the Sun. Search 2:172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel M, Karlsson GK, Meirink JF (2015) Product user manual CLOUDS, EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring, available at:, SAF/CM/DWD/PUM/CLOUDS/1.8, 2015. https://www.cmsaf.eu/SharedDocs/Literatur/document/2015/saf_cm_dwd_pum_clouds_1_8_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2. Accessed September 2019

  • Tulcan-Paulescu E, Paulescu M (2008) Fuzzy modeling of solar irradiation using air temperature data. Theor Appl Climatol 91:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WMO (2014) World Meteorological Organization. Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation, WMO-No.8, 2014 Edition updated in 2017. https://public.wmo.int/en/resources/standards-technical-regulations [Accessed April 2019]

  • Zabara K, Zenginoglou H (1989) Statistical analysis of relative sunshine in Athens. Sol Wind Technol 6:611–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number COFUND-SUSCROP-SUSCAP-2, within PNCDI III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Paulescu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brabec, M., Dumitrescu, A., Paulescu, M. et al. A new perspective on the sunshine duration variability. Theor Appl Climatol 139, 1219–1230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03046-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03046-w

Navigation