skip to main content
10.1145/2591796.2591856acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward better formula lower bounds: an information complexity approach to the KRW composition conjecture

Published:31 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the major open problems in complexity theory is proving super-logarithmic lower bounds on the depth of circuits (i.e., PNC1). This problem is interesting for two reasons: first, it is tightly related to understanding the power of parallel computation and of small-space computation; second, it is one of the first milestones toward proving super-polynomial circuit lower bounds.

Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson [21] suggested to approach this problem by proving the following conjecture: given two boolean functions f and g, the depth complexity of the composed function g o f is roughly the sum of the depth complexities of f and g. They showed that the validity of this conjecture would imply that PNC1.

As a starting point for studying the composition of functions, they introduced a relation called "the universal relation", and suggested to study the composition of universal relations. This suggestion proved fruitful, and an analogue of the KRW conjecture for the universal relation was proved by Edmonds et. al. [12]. An alternative proof was given later by Håstad and Wigderson [18]. However, studying the composition of functions seems more difficult, and the KRW conjecture is still wide open.

In this work, we make a natural step in this direction, which lies between what is known and the original conjecture: we show that an analogue of the conjecture holds for the composition of a function with a universal relation. We also suggest a candidate for the next step and provide initial results toward it.

Our main technical contribution is developing an approach based on the notion of information complexity for analyzing KW relations -- communication problems that are closely related to questions on circuit depth and formula complexity. Recently, information complexity has proved to be a powerful tool, and underlined some major progress on several long-standing open problems in communication complexity. In this work, we develop general tools for analyzing the information complexity of KW relations, which may be of independent interest.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p213-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

228.2 MB

References

  1. A. E. Andreev. On a method for obtaining more than quadratic effective lower bounds for the complexity of π-schemes. Moscow University Mathematics Bulletin, 42(1):24--29, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Z. Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 68(4):702--732, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Barak, M. Braverman, X. Chen, and A. Rao. How to compress interactive communication. In STOC, pages 67--76, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. L. Bonet and S. R. Buss. Size-depth tradeoffs for boolean fomulae. Inf. Process. Lett., 49(3):151--55, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Braverman. Interactive information complexity. In STOC, pages 505--524, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Braverman and A. Rao. Information equals amortized communication. In FOCS, pages 748--757, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Braverman and O. Weinstein. A discrepancy lower bound for information complexity. In APPROX-RANDOM, pages 459--470, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. P. Brent. The parallel evaluation of general arithmetic expressions. J. ACM, 21(2):201--206, 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Chakrabarti, Y. Shi, A. Wirth, and A. C.-C. Yao. Informational complexity and the direct sum problem for simultaneous message complexity. In FOCS, pages 270--278, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Dietzfelbinger and H. Wunderlich. A characterization of average case communication complexity. Inf. Process. Lett., 101(6):245--249, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Edmonds, R. Impagliazzo, S. Rudich, and J. Sgall. Communication complexity towards lower bounds on circuit depth. Computational Complexity, 10(3):210--246, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Frankl and N. Tokushige. The Erdős-ko-rado theorem for integer sequences. Combinatorica, 19(1):55--63, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Gavinsky, O. Meir, O. Weinstein, and A. Wigderson. Toward better formula lower bounds: An information complexity approach to the krw composition conjecture. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), (190), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Grigni and M. Sipser. Monotone separation of logspace from nc. In Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pages 294--298, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Harsha, R. Jain, D. A. McAllester, and J. Radhakrishnan. The communication complexity of correlation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(1):438--449, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Håstad. The shrinkage exponent of de morgan formulas is 2. SIAM J. Comput., 27(1):48--64, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Håstad and A. Wigderson. Composition of the universal relation. In Advances in computational complexity theory, AMS-DIMACS, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. Jain, J. Radhakrishnan, and P. Sen. A direct sum theorem in communication complexity via message compression. In ICALP, pages 300--315, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. S. Jayram, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Two applications of information complexity. In STOC, pages 673--682, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Karchmer, R. Raz, and A. Wigderson. Super-logarithmic depth lower bounds via the direct sum in communication complexity. Computational Complexity, 5(3/4):191--204, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. Karchmer and A. Wigderson. Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 3(2):255--265, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. I. Kerenidis, S. Laplante, V. Lerays, J. Roland, and D. Xiao. Lower bounds on information complexity via zero-communication protocols and applications. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 19:38, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. M. Khrapchenko. A method of obtaining lower bounds for the complexity of π-schemes. Mathematical Notes Academy of Sciences USSR, 10:474--479, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Raz and A. Wigderson. Monotone circuits for matching require linear depth. J. ACM, 39(3):736--744, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. A. Razborov and S. Rudich. Natural proofs. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 55(1):24--35, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. P. M. Spira. On time-hardware complexity tradeoffs for boolean functions. In Proceedings of the Fourth Hawaii International Symposium on System Sciences, pages 525--527, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. I. Wegener. The complexity of Boolean functions. Wiley-Teubner, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. C.-C. Yao. Some complexity questions related to distributive computing (preliminary report). In STOC, pages 209--213, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Toward better formula lower bounds: an information complexity approach to the KRW composition conjecture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '14: Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      May 2014
      984 pages
      ISBN:9781450327107
      DOI:10.1145/2591796

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 May 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      STOC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate91of319submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader