skip to main content
10.1145/2897518.2897545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Entangled simultaneity versus classical interactivity in communication complexity

Published:19 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 1999 Raz demonstrated a partial function that had an efficient quantum two-way communication protocol but no efficient classical two-way protocol and asked, whether there existed a function with an efficient quantum one-way protocol, but still no efficient classical two-way protocol. In 2010 Klartag and Regev demonstrated such a function and asked, whether there existed a function with an efficient quantum simultaneous-messages protocol, but still no efficient classical two-way protocol. In this work we answer the latter question affirmatively and present a partial function Shape, which can be computed by a protocol sending entangled simultaneous messages of poly-logarithmic size, and whose classical two-way complexity is lower bounded by a polynomial.

References

  1. S. Aaronson. Limitations of Quantum Advice and One-Way Communication. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 320–332, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Ambainis, A. Nayak, A. Ta-Shma, and U. Vazirani. Dense Quantum Coding and Quantum Finite Automata. Journal of the ACM 49(4), pages 496–511, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Z. Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, and I. Kerenidis. Exponential Separation of Quantum and Classical One-Way Communication Complexity. Proceedings of 36th Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 128–137, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. Beckner. Inequalities in Fourier Analysis. Annals of Mathematics 102, pages 159–182, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Bonami. Etude des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions de Lp(G). Annales de lˆ a ˘ A ´ ZInstitute Fourier 20(2), pages 335–402, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. de Wolf. Quantum Fingerprinting. Physical Review Letters 87(16), 167902, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. Gavinsky. Classical Interaction Cannot Replace a Quantum Message. Proceedings of the 40th Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 95–102, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Gavinsky. Classical Interaction Cannot Replace Quantum Nonlocality. 12th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Gavinsky, J. Kempe, I. Kerenidis, R. Raz, and R. de Wolf. Exponential Separations for One-Way Quantum Communication Complexity, with Applications to Cryptography. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(5), pages 1695–1708, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Gavinsky, O. Regev, and R. de Wolf. Simultaneous Communication Protocols with Quantum and Classical Messages. Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 7, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial. The Influence of Variables on Boolean Functions. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 68–80, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Klartag and O. Regev. Quantum One-Way Communication Can Be Exponentially Stronger than Classical Communication. Proceedings of the 43st Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 31–40, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. I. Kremer. Quantum Communication. Master’s thesis, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E. Kushilevitz and N. Nisan. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Raz. Exponential Separation of Quantum and Classical Communication Complexity. Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 358–367, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Samorodnitsky. On the Entropy of a Noisy Function. http: // arxiv. org/ abs/ 1508. 01464, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Entangled simultaneity versus classical interactivity in communication complexity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '16: Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 2016
      1141 pages
      ISBN:9781450341325
      DOI:10.1145/2897518

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader