Abstract
Lime water treatment on a specific lime mortar was tested and evaluated for effectiveness, showing that after a sufficiently high number of applications (160 cycles, 54–80 days of a permanent consolidation treatment) some of the poor mechanical characteristics (compression and surface cohesion) were substantially improved. The lime water treatment was also compared with some other less labour-intensive technologies. The most efficient agents were dispersions of calcium hydroxide in alcohols, which are marketed under the trade name CaLoSiL by the German producer IBZ Freiberg. The major advantage with these agents is that they can be applied much more rapidly than tens to hundreds of lime water cycles and they deliver a higher amount of lime in each cycle. While lime water contains only small calcium ions, sized about 0.1 nm, calcium hydroxide particles in CaLoSiL are considerably larger (50–200 nm). This property makes the use of these nanolime dispersions limited to structural consolidation of porous material with a sufficiently large pore diameter. Nanolime dispersions applied to mortar where the majority of pores are around 100 µm in diameter is efficient enough to allow for a one-day application of CaLoSiL E15 (7 cycles), to reach significant strengthening. It appears from the results that lower concentrations of CaLoSiL (E 15) create a better distribution of the new binder and therefore lead to higher compression strength than the more concentrated CaLoSiL (IP 25). Diluted, 8% silicic acid ester, applied in two cycles, showed the same consolidation effect as CaLoSiL E 15 applied in 7 cycles. Surface cohesion of mortar was improved following most of the consolidation treatments tested, including multiple applications of ammonium oxalate and barium water. Addition of metakaolin to lime water did not provide any added strengthening benefit. However, the combination of silicic acid ester with nano-lime product (CaLoSiL IP 25) was shown to be effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brajer, I., & Kalsbeek, N. (1999). Limewater absorption and calcite crystal formation on a limewater-impregnated secco wall paintings. Studies in Conservation, 44, 145–156.
Drdácký, M., Lesák, J., Rescic, S., Slížková, Z., Tiano, P., & Valach, J. (2012). Standardization of peeling tests for assessing the cohesion and consolidation characteristics of historic stone surfaces. Materials and Structures, 45(4), 505–520.
Drdácký, M., & Slížková, Z. (2008). Calcium hydroxide based consolidation of lime mortars and stone. In Delgado Rodrigues J, Mimoso JM (Eds.), Proceedings of the International symposium ‘‘Stone consolidation in cultural heritage’’. LNEC: Lisbon, May 2008, ISBN 978-972-49-2135-8, pp 299–308.
Drdácký, M., & Slížková, Z. (2012). Lime-water consolidation effects on poor lime mortars. APT Bulletin, 43(1), 31–36.
Ferreira Pinto, A. P., & Delgado Rodrigues, J. (2007). Stone consolidation: The role of treatment procedures. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9, 38–53.
Millar, W. (1998). Plastering (plain & decorative). 1897. Reprint, Donhead Publishing Ltd.
Mora, L., Mora, P., & Philippot, J. (1977). La conservation des peintures murales. ICCROM
Moreau, C., Slížková, Z., & Drdácký, M. (2010). Consolidation of pure lime mortars with nanoparticles of calcium hydroxide. Proceeding of the 2nd Historic Mortars Conference HMC2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM ‘Repair Mortars for Historic Masonry’ Final Workshop (pp. 1113–1121). CR: Prague.
Peterson, S. (1982). Lime water consolidation, mortars, cements and grouts used in the conservation of historic building. Roma: ICCROM
Price, C. A. (1984). The consolidation of limestone using a lime poultice and limewater, adhesives and consolidants. II C, London.
Price, C., Ross, K., & White, G. (1988). A further appraisal of the “lime technique” for limestone consolidation, using a radioactive tracer. Studies in Conservation, 33, 178–186.
Quayle, N. J. T. (1996). The Case Against Lime Water (or, the futility of consolidating stone with calcium hydroxide). Conservation News, 59, 68–71.
RILEM II. 8b (1980). Water drop absorption. RILEM 25-PEM, “Recommendations provisoires. Essais recommandés pour mesurer l’altération des pierres et évaluer l’efficacité des méthodes de traitement”. Matériaux et Construction 13(75), 215–216.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Czech Grant Agency GA ČR grant 17-05030S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slížková, Z., Drdácký, M. (2019). Effects of Various Chemical Agents on Mechanical Characteristics of Weak Lime Mortar. In: Hughes, J., Válek, J., Groot, C. (eds) Historic Mortars. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91606-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91606-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91604-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91606-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)