Abstract
MS SPIDOC is a novel sample delivery system designed for single (isolated) particle imaging at X-ray Free-Electron Lasers that is adaptable towards most large-scale facility beamlines. Biological samples can range from small proteins to MDa particles. Following nano-electrospray ionization, ionic samples can be m/z-filtered and structurally separated before being oriented at the interaction zone. Here, we present the simulation package developed alongside this prototype. The first part describes how the front-to-end ion trajectory simulations have been conducted. Highlighted is a quadrant lens; a simple but efficient device that steers the ion beam within the vicinity of the strong DC orientation field in the interaction zone to ensure spatial overlap with the X-rays. The second part focuses on protein orientation and discusses its potential with respect to diffractive imaging methods. Last, coherent diffractive imaging of prototypical T = 1 and T = 3 norovirus capsids is shown. We use realistic experimental parameters from the SPB/SFX instrument at the European XFEL to demonstrate that low-resolution diffractive imaging data (q < 0.3 nm−1) can be collected with only a few X-ray pulses. Such low-resolution data are sufficient to distinguish between both symmetries of the capsids, allowing to probe low abundant species in a beam if MS SPIDOC is used as sample delivery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Unraveling the structure–function relationship of biomolecules is of fundamental scientific interest. Due to its complexity, complementary approaches such as X-ray or electron diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, or cryogenic electron microscopy are applied to measure the structure of, for example, proteins and non-covalently bound protein complexes such as viral capsids. Importantly, structural data is mostly available from a single condition creating a training bias for structure prediction, resulting in an insufficient understanding of underlying structural dynamics and hence limited clues on structural ensembles and transient states present in the solution.
Nowadays, mass spectrometry (MS) covers much more than simply determining the mass of a protein to very high accuracy [1]. Techniques like collision-induced dissociation (CID) and MS/MS approaches can disentangle the primary structure of proteins; ion mobility (IM) or hydrogen–deuterium exchange (HDX) MS allows access to the tertiary structure of proteins. In native MS, the structure of the protein complex is preserved, making it a useful tool to dissect quaternary structures. Therefore, MS provides a dynamic view on structures at multiple levels. To achieve atomic resolution imaging, the above-mentioned imaging (X-ray, electron) and spectroscopic (NMR) techniques are used nowadays. While these techniques are all very powerful and useful, each of them has its own strengths and weaknesses ranging from limitations of molecular size, through predominantly static snapshots of dynamic structures to bias towards highly abundant and energetically more favorable species.
In a novel approach, we aim to use MS techniques as sample delivery for imaging techniques like coherent diffractive imaging (CDI) to combine the advantages of both approaches. The development of this technique is the core of the Horizon 2020–funded research project MS SPIDOC (mass spectrometry for single-particle imaging of dipole-oriented complexes) [2].
Single-particle imaging (SPI) is an experimental technique at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) where multiple (up to millions) isolated particles are imaged individually, and their diffraction patterns are added to retrieve a full 3D diffraction image [3,4,5]. The approach hence resembles SPI in cryo-EM. Nowadays, SPI experiments at XFELs primarily utilize aerodynamic-focusing injectors as sample delivery systems [3]. MS SPIDOC provides three major benefits. It allows m/z-selectivity to ensure that the recorded diffraction patterns belong to the same species. The orientation of proteins can reduce the number of required diffraction patterns [6], and no gas is required to focus and decharge the sample, which significantly reduces the number of background photons. In addition, nano-ESI allows for very low sample consumption (nL/min), which is especially important for precious biological samples. MS SPIDOC is designed for the SPB/SFX instrument at the European XFEL [7]. However, the parts specific to the implementation of this instrument are not shown here, and its modularity allows for easy adaption to other beamlines and facilities.
Here, we show a front-to-end simulation of the entire setup for a possible diffraction experiment. In “Results: ion trajectory simulations,” we present the setup of MS SPIDOC and use this as a basis to discuss the performed ion trajectory simulations. A closer and more detailed look of the ion trajectory simulations can be found in the deliverable of the MS SPIDOC project [8]. “Results: protein orientation” describes how proteins are oriented in external direct current (DC) fields. Finally, simulated SPI of biologically relevant norovirus capsids is shown and discussed in “Results: diffraction.” It shows that MS SPIDOC is a versatile sample delivery system for selective probing of transient or low abundant species with X-ray pulses, be it diffraction or fragmentation as readout.
Results: ion trajectory simulations
Figure 1 shows a computer-aided design (CAD) of the MS SPIDOC setup. Highlighted are the individual components, namely the ion transfer interface (ITI), the digital ion filter and trap (DIT), the ion mobility chamber (IM), the transfer hexapole, the quadrant lens, and the dipole orientation electrode (DO). In addition, a nano-ESI source in the form of the Triversa Nanomate (Advion) is shown. The Triversa Nanomate is a robotized sample delivery system, which can also be replaced by a static nano-ESI. The displayed setup is the standard configuration of MS SPIDOC and used for the front-to-end simulation. Based on specific applications, the modularity of the setup allows for the interchanging or removal of individual components.
Ion trajectory simulations have been conducted for the different segments individually via Simion [9] or SIMAX [10]. Ion trajectory handover between the modules has typically happened at the intersections between the modules by providing the phase space distribution of the individual ion ensembles. However, handover has also been tested at other positions within each module with no significant influence on the outcome of the trajectory simulations.
The simulations were performed on different cluster sizes (n) and charge states (m) of cesium iodide [(CsI)nCs]m+ (3, 3.3, and 6.1 kDa), ubiquitin (8.6 kDa, Ubi1+ and Ubi6+), hemoglobin (64 kDa, Hb13+), and chaperonin GroEL (808 kDa, GroEL62+). The samples were represented by hard spheres and their corresponding m/z values.
The first module that has been modeled was the ITI, which is composed of the aerolens™ [11], the ion funnel, a combined octapolar/quadrupolar ion guide, and a hexapole. The aerolens is designed to increase the transmission efficiency during the transport of ions into the gas phase. Due to the high-pressure region within the aerolens, gas-flow dynamics were used for the simulations. Starting from the ion funnel (ITI), the ions were treated with an initial axial velocity of 500 m/s. The gas pressure (N2) was set to 2 mbar in the funnel area, and between 10−3 and 10−2 mbar in the octapole region to improve the thermalization of the ions by collisions with the background gas. Thermalization of the ion motion is important to reduce ion losses as non-thermalized ions primarily exhibit losses through transversal movement [12]. The simulations showed that especially heavier species like GroEL62+ profit from elevated pressures and an additional trapping time of up to 5 ms within the octapole region. After thermalization, the ions are transferred with a near-zero eV ion beam through the second aperture following the ITI octapole into the ITI hexapole and guided towards the DIT module. The near-zero kinetic energy enables thereby again an efficient transmission and trapping of the ions in the DIT module.
The DIT consists of a quadrupole filter, an ion trap, and the input and output transfer hexapoles. A detailed description of this module can be found in [13]. In short, the DIT is driven by a digital radiofrequency (RF) signal, i.e., the electric field is switched between ground and a positive voltage at a frequency of several hundred kHz. The duty cycle can be chosen freely and is 50% in normal transmission mode to mimic the fundamental of a sinusoidal frequency. The digital guiding field has two main advantages: (i) it allows for fast tuning over a wide m/z range as it does not rely on resonant circuits; (ii) the broad mass range used for this setup would have required at a certain point altered hardware with sinusoidally driven fields. In general, the DIT can be used in transmission as well as trapping mode. In both cases, the digital filter can be set to a broad (several thousand) m/z range, or to individual or multiple adjacent peaks of the spectrum. Peak selection is achieved by tuning the frequency and the duty cycle of the driving RF field. Typically, mass-resolving power RFootnote 1 comes at the cost of transmission, ranging from close to 100% transmission for R < 100 down to transmission of 15% for R ≈ 700. Filtering besides selectivity reduces the risk of space charge effects in the trap. Within the trap region, buffer gas can be applied for thermalization purposes and hence efficient trapping over prolonged times of 100 ms. This trapping duration is important since the initial operating mode of MS SPIDOC is designed based on the X-ray pulse structure of the European XFEL, i.e., a dark time of 99.4 ms, followed by a 0.6 ms burst of X-rays. In addition, a pulsed ionic beam is also necessary for spatial separation in the ion mobility device.
The ion mobility module was specifically designed to separate different conformers of large biomolecules and their complexes. This was achieved by modifying an ion mobility system from [14], i.e., a modified, high-fidelity resistive glass drift tube. The simulations were conducted with a few mbar of pressure (N2) inside the drift cell and showed that a transmission of above 95% is achieved for species larger than 1450 m/z, for which the device is primarily designed. At 556 m/z (leucine enkephalin), the transmission drops to 20%. A resolution of 20 can realistically be achieved for the arrival time distributions, although this is partially masked by broad conformational ensembles observed in proteins.
Subsequently, the ions are transported to the X-ray interaction zone via a transfer hexapole and a quadrant lens. The latter can be used to steer the ion beam transversely and overlap it with intersecting X-rays in the center of the DO (Fig. 2). This steering capability is essential for fine alignment, since it is much easier to translate the sample position compared to moving the X-rays. In the given setup with −50 kV high acceleration voltage for dipole orientation, the ion position can be shifted by several mm, i.e., several times the ion beam diameter, by applying comparably low voltages between 20 and 90 V.
Results: protein orientation
The orientation of proteins as discussed in the following utilizes the fact that most proteins do have an intrinsic permanent dipole moment. By applying an external DC electric field, the protein can orient such that its dipole moment orients along the external field lines. Such an orientation can be beneficial for X-ray imaging techniques such as SPI and conventional X-ray scattering methods like small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Considering SPI, controlling the orientation in one dimension, the problem of combining the diffraction patterns during 3D electron density reconstruction could be substantially reduced [6]. Adding the knowledge about orientation to the so-called Expand, Maximize, and Compress (EMC) computer algorithms [15] used for clustering, the diffraction patterns could have three advantages: (i) speeding up the algorithms by faster convergence; (ii) reducing the number of required diffraction patterns, thus saving sample and experimental time; and finally (iii) finding convergence in some case where it would be impossible without prior knowledge on orientation—for example, when there is missing data in the diffraction patterns due to the detector geometry. The first case is relevant for large and complex data sets, whereas (ii) and (iii) represent common situations where the number of useful hits is low or when the beam stop/gaps in the detector array precludes data collection in certain areas. This method of taking advantage of a known angle is generally called enhanced-EMC, or EEMC (Fig. 3).
In SAXS, the orientation would potentially provide more structural information than current conventional methods. For a protein with a non-spherical form, it is in principle possible to get information on the extension of the molecules along more than one direction (Fig. 3).
Molecular dynamics simulations predict that it is possible to take advantage of the intrinsic dipole moment present in most proteins to orient the protein using electric fields [6]. These simulations show that static field strength between 0.05 and 1.5 V/nm indeed orients four simulated proteins (ubiquitin, lysozyme, ctf, Trp-cage) without significantly distorting their structure. In a follow-up study, a more realistic simulation setup was used, where the electric field was not turned on immediately but rather gradually increased as the protein ion approaches the orientation device, or as the voltage switches from 0 to VMax. Slowly ramping up the field seems to better preserve the molecular structure of the protein [16], which is an advantage in any imaging experiment. In the case of fields that are strong enough to unfold the protein structure, the protein first orients and then unfolds, following the principle of “orientation before destruction.” This finding indicates the possibility to use at first a stronger field for orientation, followed by a weaker field to maintain the orientation. Using molecular dynamics simulations and following the simulation protocol described in [16], we have investigated this, and the results are presented in Fig. 4. The simulations were done with the ubiquitin protein and two different electric field strengths. First, a higher field Ei was applied for 1 ns, followed by a lower field Ef for 1 ns. The quality of the orientation is defined using the degree of orientation, D = 1 − < cosθ > , where θ is the averaged angle between the field and the total dipole of the molecules. Both field strengths/durations are below the value where a significant structural change is expected [6], and more details on the simulations can be found in [16, 17]. The results show that it is to some extent possible to first orient the molecule in a stronger field and then keep the orientation using a weaker field. Therefore, it could be beneficial to only shortly expose the protein to strong fields for structural preservation. Alternatively, a well-timed X-ray pulse could capture the oriented structure before the destructive effect of the field can manifest.
Results: diffraction
The MS SPIDOC setup is designed to deliver biological samples into the XFEL beam, to generate an interpretable X-ray diffraction image. While the ultimate goal is to be able to mass- and conformationally select transient species from solutions, to initially demonstrate the benefit of sorting particles based on size, we focused on two geometrical configurations of norovirus-like particles, the T = 1 (3 MDa) or T = 3 (10 MDa) capsids, which are accessible to native MS and can be separated by their m/z [18, 19]. We have used these known structures as a starting point to calculate the expected diffraction signal from a single-pulse XFEL exposure. Simulations were performed using the tool package SIMEX [20] developed at the European XFEL. We used experimental parameters relevant to the X-ray pulse and detector as listed in Table 1. All photons are assumed to interact with the sample at the same time, i.e., the X-ray pulse duration is zero and is providing therefore an instantaneous diffraction pattern.
We simulated ten diffraction patterns from each of the two capsids, each time with the capsid in a new, random orientation. Examples of the diffraction patterns can be seen in Fig. 5. To estimate if it is possible to distinguish the two capsids apart based purely on diffraction data, we calculated the total diffracted signal in the ten individual patterns, and then integrated over 2π. This way we can compare the expected diffracted signal as a function of the scattering angle for the two systems. This would, in an experiment, allow for online sorting without the need for reconstruction, and it would allow us to study the particle sorting sensitivity in the MS SPIDOC instrument.
We expect that there are two major types of structural dynamics that will influence the diffracted signal: the sample heterogeneity, i.e., how different each of the T = 1 or T = 3 capsids from each other, and sample dynamics due to radiation damage. A recent study showed the impact that the structural fluctuations of two globular proteins would have on the achievable resolution in an XFEL SPI experiment using all-atom classical molecular dynamics simulations [21], as implemented in the GROMACS simulation package [22]. Lysozyme and ubiquitin were simulated in a vacuum, at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K. Diffraction signals were calculated using a package developed by [23], using the same principles as SIMEX. From the study done on the two globular proteins, it can be concluded that the expected resolution limit due to structural fluctuations is below 2 Å, at temperatures up to 350 K. This fluctuation is well below the resolution needed to see the differences between T = 1 and T = 3.
In T = 1 and T = 3, we have multiple copies of the same proteins forming together the large non-covalently bound capsid assembly, whereas in the aforementioned study of the two globular proteins, we investigated only separate monomeric proteins. We expect that the resolution limit of the two norovirus capsids is less affected by structural fluctuations than the two globular proteins, since a repetition of units both increases the stability of the system through increased contacts and the ways to dissipate excess energy, as well as increases the scattered X-ray signal.
Radiation damage is the other source of structural dynamics that could affect the ability to image the capsids. The effect of the ionization on the speckle contrast, directly linked to the resolution, was investigated by [24]. This study was done on a 14 kDa globular protein (lysozyme), for which we expect that the photo-induced Coulomb explosion is faster than for systems as large as capsids. It was concluded that speckle contrast from lysozyme is more sensitive to natural structural variations than to the radiation damage induced from pulses with a pulse duration of up to 50 fs; a relatively long duration pulse at most XFELs.
Based on our simulations, we can conclude that the initial imaging part of the proposed experiment is feasible. We should initially be able to detect the differences between the T = 1 and T = 3 capsids. The noise we expect from radiation damage and structural fluctuations has no significant influence on the resolution required to distinguish the two capsids. Moreover, large structural changes due to ionization and gas-phase transfer are unrealistic without significant activation [25]. The structural integrity has further been proven in complementary approaches using native MS for the preparation of m/z selected protein complexes for electron microscopy [26, 27]. Our conclusions are in line with earlier bio-imaging experiments at the European XFEL [5, 28], which support the notion that we should experimentally be able to detect at least the two first scattering rings from the two capsids.
As the research field is developing very fast, it is difficult to estimate the achievable resolution in a future experiment. This is mainly due to the background and achievable number of snapshot frames currently being the largest limiting factor in such experiments [3]. Optimizations of both factors are being investigated by multiple groups, and the progress is very rapid. MS SPIDOC contributes by providing a background-free sample delivery system with the capability for future advanced experimental schemes.
Conclusion and outlook
The ion trajectory simulations define the setup parameters of the prototype and provide useful information with regard to good experimental parameters for the individual components. A simple quadrant lens can be used to overlap the ion beam with the X-rays even in the presence of a strong DC orientation field. Moreover, protein orientation (or in general sample orientation) can be very beneficial for CDI experiments like SPI or SAXS. DC orientation fields have a minimal influence on the protein structure. In addition, the orientation can likely be maintained in weaker electric fields after orientation in initial stronger DC electric fields. This combination allows further reduction of any adverse influence on protein structure. SPI simulations with realistic XFEL parameters show that T = 1 and T = 3 norovirus capsids provide enough scattering signal to distinguish between both symmetries on the basis of just a handful diffraction patterns, and are therefore also very promising candidates for first proof-of-principle experiments.
In general, MS SPIDOC provides unique features as a sample delivery system:
-
1.
The ITI is used to significantly increase the ion flux for kDa-MDa protein samples, allowing further reduction of the estimated measurement times for SPI from [29].
-
2.
Due to the charge of ions, m/z filters can be applied to select relevant species from more complex mixtures, which is a key feature considering the innate heterogeneity of many biological samples. In addition, ion mobility can be used to further reduce the structural heterogeneity of the sample by conformational or topological separation.
-
3.
The MS-based sample delivery systems allow providing of samples in the absence of background scatterers such as gases or liquids.
-
4.
The possibility to orient proteins in the interaction zone increases the information content that can be gained by CDI experiments.
MS SPIDOC is a sample delivery system specifically designed for the measurement of biologically relevant samples at X-ray facilities. In contrast to much simpler aerodynamic-focusing-based sample delivery systems used for SPI at XFELS, MS SPIDOC utilizes state-of-the-art MS-based techniques to pre-select (size and conformation) and orient the sample. These measures promise a significant reduction of measurement time, opening thereby the possibility to study a much broader range of biological samples, including low abundant species, transient states, and mixtures of samples. Apart from static structure measurements, MS SPIDOC is already set up to measure viral particles and their intermediate species as exemplified in other native MS studies [30]. Last but not least, the sample delivery system can also be used for sample delivery beyond CDI. Of specific interest is native top-down MS where the X-rays can be used to fragment protein complexes and thereby circumvent intrinsic problems of bottom-up MS caused by post-digestion analysis of the proteins’ primary structure.
Notes
R = (m/z)/(Δm/z), where Δm/z is the minimum peak separation which allows to distinguish two ion species.
References
Dülfer, J, Kadek, A, Kopicki, J.-D, Krichel, B, Uetrecht, C. “Structural mass spectrometry goes viral,” Adv Virus Res., vol. 105, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 189–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2019.07.003.
Kadek A, Lorenzen K, Uetrecht C. In a flash of light: X-ray free electron lasers meet native mass spectrometry. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2021;39:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2021.07.001.
Bielecki J, Maia FRNC, Mancuso AP. Perspectives on single particle imaging with x rays at the advent of high repetition rate x-ray free electron laser sources. Struct Dyn. 2020;7(4):040901. https://doi.org/10.1063/4.0000024.
Bogan MJ, et al. Single particle X-ray diffractive imaging. Nano Lett. 2008;8(1):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl072728k.
Sobolev E, et al. Megahertz single-particle imaging at the European XFEL. Commun Phys. May2020;3(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-0362-y.
Marklund EG, Ekeberg T, Moog M, Benesch JLP, Caleman C. Controlling protein orientation in vacuum using electric fields. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8(18):4540–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02005.
Round A, Mancuso A. “SPB/SFX instrument review report,” no. REPORT. XFEL.EU TR-2022–002, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22003/XFEL.EU-TR-2022-002.
MS SPIDOC, “Report of deliverable D2.4: software pipeline for device modelling,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/801406/results.
Dahl, DA. “Simion for the personal computer in reflection,” Vol. 200 State Field We Move New Millenium, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 3–25, Dec. 2000, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00305-5.
“Mscube SIMAX.” [Online]. Available: https://mscube.co.nz/simax.html..
Papanastasiou D, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of under-expanded gas flows for optimal operation of a novel multipole differential ion mobility filter in the first vacuum-stage of a mass spectrometer. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2021;465:116605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116605.
van den Heuvel RHH, et al. Improving the performance of a quadrupole time-of-flight instrument for macromolecular mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2006;78(21):7473–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061039a.
Simke F, Fischer P, Marx G, Schweikhard L. Simulations of a digital ion filter and a digital ion trap for heavy biomolecules. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2022;473:116779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116779.
McCullough BJ, et al. Development of an ion mobility quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer. Anal Chem. 2008;80(16):6336–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac800651b.
Loh N-TD, Elser V. Reconstruction algorithm for single-particle diffraction imaging experiments. Phys Rev E. 2009;80(2):026705. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026705.
Sinelnikova A, et al. Protein orientation in time-dependent electric fields: orientation before destruction. Biophys J. 2021;120(17):3709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.07.017.
Sinelnikova A, et al. Reproducibility in the unfolding process of protein induced by an external electric field. Chem Sci. 2021;12(6):2030–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC06008A.
Pogan R, Schneider C, Reimer R, Hansman G, Uetrecht C. Norovirus-like VP1 particles exhibit isolate dependent stability profiles. J Phys Condens Matter. 2018;30(6):064006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aaa43b.
Pogan R, et al. N-terminal VP1 truncations favor T = 1 norovirus-like particles. Vaccines. 2020;9(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010008.
Fortmann-Grote C, et al. Start-to-end simulation of single-particle imaging using ultra-short pulses at the European X-ray Free-Electron Laser. IUCrJ. 2017;4(5):560–8. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517009496.
Mandl T, Östlin C, Dawod IE, Brodmerkel MN, Marklund EG, Martin AV, Timneanu N, Caleman C. Structural heterogeneity in single particle imaging using x-ray lasers. J Phys Chem Lett 2020;11(15):6077–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01144.
Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1701–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20291.
Martin AV, Corso JK, Caleman C, Timneanu N, Quiney HM. Single-molecule imaging with longer X-ray laser pulses. IUCrJ. 2015;2(Pt 6):661–74. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252515016887.
Östlin C, Timneanu N, Caleman C, Martin AV. Is radiation damage the limiting factor in high-resolution single particle imaging with X-ray free-electron lasers? Struct Dyn. 2019;6(4):044103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5098309.
Seo J, Hoffmann W, Warnke S, Bowers MT, Pagel K, von Helden G. Retention of native protein structures in the absence of solvent: a coupled ion mobility and spectroscopic study. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55(45):14173–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201606029.
Esser TK, Böhning J, Fremdling P, Bharat T, Gault J, Rauschenbach S. Cryo-EM samples of gas-phase purified protein assemblies using native electrospray ion-beam deposition. Faraday Discuss. 2022;240:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2FD00065B.
Fremdling P, et al. A preparative mass spectrometer to deposit intact large native protein complexes. ACS Nano. 2022;16(9):14443–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c04831.
Ayyer K, et al. 3D diffractive imaging of nanoparticle ensembles using an x-ray laser. Optica. 2021;8(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.410851.
Uetrecht C, et al. Native mass spectrometry provides sufficient ion flux for XFEL single-particle imaging. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019;26(3):653–9. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577519002686.
Uetrecht C, Barbu IM, Shoemaker GK, van Duijn E, Heck AJR. Interrogating viral capsid assembly with ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Nat Chem. 2011;3(2):126–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.947.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by MS SPIDOC within the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 801406. The Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) is supported by the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg and the Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). A. K. gratefully acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. C. U., A. K., and L. S. further acknowledge funding through Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 05K2016 VISAVIX (05K16HG1, 05K16BH1). E. G. M. is supported by a Project grant from the Swedish Research Council (2020–04825). E. D. S., C. U., C. C., and E. G. M. acknowledge support from a Röntgen Ångström Cluster grant (SAXFELS) provided by the Swedish Research Council and the BMBF (05K2022—2021–05988). C. C. further acknowledges the Helmholtz Association through the Center of Free-electron Laser Science at DESY and the Swedish Research Council (grant 2018–00740).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
T. K., A. K., C. C., and C. U. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. B. B. and L. A. I. R. performed the IM module ion trajectory simulations under the lead of P. B. A. B.,
M. N. B., I. D., E. D. S., T. M., and A. Si. conducted the protein orientation and diffraction simulations under the lead of C. C., E. G. M., and N. T. A. L., D. P., and A. Sm. conducted ion.trajectory simulations for the ITI and set the basis for the common trajectory simulations of all modules. F. S. conducted the ion trajectory simulations for the DIT moduleunder the lead of L. S. K. L. contributed to the coordination of the project and the overall development of the simulations package as well as prototype design. J. C., L. L. M., and T. D. contributed to the comprehensive design of the MS SPIDOC setup.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Published in the topical collection Young Investigators in (Bio-)Analytical Chemistry 2023 with guest editors Zhi-Yuan Gu, Beatriz Jurado-Sánchez, Thomas H. Linz, Leandro Wang Hantao, Nongnoot Wongkaew, and Peng Wu.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kierspel, T., Kadek, A., Barran, P. et al. Coherent diffractive imaging of proteins and viral capsids: simulating MS SPIDOC. Anal Bioanal Chem 415, 4209–4220 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04658-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04658-y