http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-2483
Figures
Abstract
Trypanosomatid flagellates have not been studied in Austria in any detail. In this study, specific nested PCR, targeted on the ribosomal small subunit, was used to determine the occurrence and diversity of trypanosomatids in wild-caught mosquitoes sampled across Eastern Austria in the years 2014−2015. We collected a total of 29,975 mosquitoes of 19 species divided in 1680 pools. Of these, 298 (17.7%), representing 12 different mosquito species, were positive for trypanosomatid DNA. In total, seven trypanosomatid spp. were identified (three Trypanosoma, three Crithidia and one Herpetomonas species), with the highest parasite species diversity found in the mosquito host Coquillettidia richiardii. The most frequent parasite species belonged to the mammalian Trypanosoma theileri/cervi species complex (found in 105 pools; 6.3%). The avian species T. culicavium (found in 69 pools; 4.1%) was only detected in mosquitoes of the genus Culex, which corresponds to their preference for avian hosts. Monoxenous trypanosomatids of the genus Crithidia and Herpetomonas were found in 20 (1.3%) mosquito pools. One third (n = 98) of the trypanosomatid positive mosquito pools carried more than one parasite species. This is the first large scale study of trypanosomatid parasites in Austrian mosquitoes and our results are valuable in providing an overview of the diversity of these parasites in Austria.
Citation: Schoener E, Uebleis SS, Cuk C, Nawratil M, Obwaller AG, Zechmeister T, et al. (2018) Trypanosomatid parasites in Austrian mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 13(4): e0196052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196052
Editor: Vyacheslav Yurchenko, University of Ostrava, CZECH REPUBLIC
Received: December 8, 2017; Accepted: April 5, 2018; Published: April 19, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Schoener et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was funded by the ERA-Net BiodivERsA, with the national funders FWF I-1437, ANR-13-EBID-0007-01 and DFG BiodivERsA KL 2087/6-1 as part of the 2012–13 BiodivERsA call for research proposals as well as by ERD Funds, project CePaViP (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000759).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Trypanosomatids are flagellates parasitizing both invertebrates and vertebrates [1–3]. They are evolutionary more ancestral than other protists [4] and there is evidence that the history of vertebrate trypanosomatid parasites, vectored by dipteran insects, reaches back to the Early Cretaceous [5]. Several genera of the family Trypanosomatidae are monoxenous (with only one host) parasites of dipteran insects, namely Leptomonas, Crithida, Herpetomonas, Jaenimonas, and Strigomonas [5, 6, 7] and the newly described Sergeia [8], Angomonas [9], Kentomonas [10] and Zelonia [11]. Monoxenous insect trypanosomatids remain neglected and represent a relatively obscure group within the family Trypanosomatidae. However, some members of the genus Crithidia were described in detail. In laboratory experiments they did not show any negative impact on their insect hosts, which are in most cases mosquitoes [12–14]. The members of the genus Crithidia, Herpetomonas and Strigomonas have been found in a wider variety of mosquitoes and other bloodsucking nematocerans [15–18] and advances in molecular genetics have aided in determining their systematic and taxonomy [2, 4, 19, 20]. These advances also lead to the proposal of several new genera, e.g., Angomonas, Strigomonas, Kentomonas, Jaenimonas, Novymonas, Blechomonas etc. [7, 9, 20–22]; and allowed the study of distribution, diversity and host specificity of monoxenous trypanosomatids which were published previously in [7, 23, 24].
There is a substantial support for the hypothesis that the dixenous life cycle emerged from the monoxenous one independently for representatives of the dixenous genera Trypanosoma, Leishmania, and Phytomonas [4, 7, 25, 26]. Therefore, monoxenous trypanosomatids of mosquitoes and other bloodsucking insects can represent a crucial evolutionary link which is important for the elucidation of the emergence of a dixenous parasite life cycle.
Today, trypanosomatids are known primarily as important dixenous parasites of vertebrates, transmitted by various invertebrate vectors. Several species of the genus Trypanosoma cause serious and even life-threatening diseases in livestock [27, 28] and two species, T. brucei s.l. [29, 30] and T. cruzi [31, 32], have a significant impact on human health. However, in the case of trypanosome infections, any serious impact on host health is rather an exception, and many trypanosome species occurring in wildlife and domestic animals may be considered as non-pathogenic parasites. Trypanosomes are common parasites of fish [33], birds, such as T. avium s.l. [16, 34–38], and of ungulates (especially domestic cattle), like the T. theileri complex [20, 39–41]. Both the T. avium and T. theileri species complexes are cosmopolitan and found worldwide [40, 42, 43].
Various dipteran insects have been identified as competent vectors of different bird trypanosome species by experimental infections, with T. avium transmitted by blackflies (Similium spp.) [35, 44], T. corvi by hippoboscid flies (Ornithomyia spp.) [37, 45], and the T. bennetti group by biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) [46]. In 2012, a new trypanosome species, T. culicavium, was described in Central Europe, and appears to be a parasite of insectivorous passerine birds with Culex mosquitoes as a vector [47].
Insect-borne trypanosomes found in Europe develop in the alimentary tract of bloodsucking insects [48] and are transmitted to vertebrates either by regurgitation of intestinal content [49], faecal matter deposited at the bite site [44] or by ingestion of the insect [47]. In the vertebrate hosts, these parasites can be found in blood [40, 50], bone marrow [51] or inner organs [52]. In general, these trypanosomes are not regarded as pathogenic for the vertebrate hosts and T. theileri-like parasites and avian trypanosomes do not appear to overtly affect their hosts [40, 50, 52]. In the insect vectors, however, parasites can have a much larger impact, e.g. due to the blockage and destruction of the stomodeal valve facilitating the parasite transmission to the vertebrate host [49]. Host specificity of trypanosomes in vertebrates depends on the species and some have very broad host spectra like T. avium s.l., which has been found to infect a wide variety of bird orders and families [35, 38, 51].
Austrian mosquitoes have not been examined for trypanosomatid parasites before. We therefore screened female mosquitoes collected over two years in three Eastern Austrian provinces, namely Burgenland, Lower Austria and Vienna, to gain an overview which mosquito-borne trypanosomatids are present in the area, as well as to determine parasite diversity and prevalence in different mosquito species.
Material and methods
Trypanosomatid DNA for the study was obtained from mosquitoes sampled during a monitoring effort across the three provinces of Eastern Austria (Burgenland, Lower Austria, and Vienna) at 35 permanent and 25 non-permanent trapping sites. These sites were on public as well as private land, which was entered with the permission of the owners. Citizen Scientists in Lower Austria and Burgenland assisted with the sampling effort. At permanent sampling sites, mosquitoes were collected for a 24 hour time period on a regular basis every second week from April to October in 2014 and 2015, using BG- Sentinel traps (Biogents, Regensburg, Germany) equipped with bottled carbon dioxide (Air Liquide, Schwechat, Austria) as attractant. Non-permanent sampling sites were sampled at least once and up to six times over a 24 hour period during the summer months using CO2-baited BG-Sentinel traps as above or by hand aspirators. All mosquitoes were stored at −80°C until further procedure.
Morphological identification of mosquito species was performed using the identification key of Becker et al. [53] and females were pooled by species, collection site and date, with a maximum number of 50 individuals. In 2014, three legs of each individual of Cx. pipiens s.l. / Cx. torrentium were taken and processed individually to identify the species/biotypes genetically in the frame of another project [54]. These mosquitoes were pooled after genetic identification which allowed us to determine the trypanosomatid parasite incidence in different biotypes of this species complex in more detail.
For amplifying trypanosomatid parasite DNA, each DNA sample was then subjected to nested PCR, described by [55] without modification. The used primers target a ~2000 bp fragment of the ribosomal small subunit (SSU) gene. Obtained sequences were viewed and aligned using the software Geneious, version 10.0.6 [56]. Then the sequences were compared for similarity to sequences available on the GenBank® database. In the case of SSU rRNA gene sequence (Acc. No.: MG255960) of the most likely new Herpetomonas species (TR_SU106), a phylogenetic tree was constructed using all available sequences of Herpetomonas species retrieved from GenBank with Phytomonas spp. as an outgroup (Fig 1). Alignments for phylogenetic analysis were generated in Kalign [57]; the ambiguously aligned positions in the trimmed alignment were removed manually in BioEdit (Ibis Therapeutics, Carlsbad, US). The final dataset contained 46 taxa and 1,988 nucleotide positions. Analyses were done in MrBayes [58] and PhyML [59] with model optimization in ModelTest [60], version 3.06. A general time-reversible substitution model with a mixed model for among-site rate variation (GTR + Γ + I) was chosen as the best fitting model of sequence evolution. Bootstrap analyses involved heuristic searches with 1,000 replicates (ML). Bayesian inference was accomplished in MrBayes 3.2.2 with analysis run for 5 million generations with covarion and sampling every 100 generations. Other parameters were left in their default states.
Bootstrap values from Bayesian posterior probabilities (5 million generations) and bootstrap percentages for maximum-likelihood (PhyML) analysis (1,000 replicates) are shown at the nodes; dashes indicate <50% bootstrap support or different topology; asterisks mark branches with maximal statistical support; double-crossed branches are 50% of the original length. The tree was rooted with five sequences of Phytomonas spp., the closest relative of the genus Herpetomonas. Parasite names, names of strains or GenBank accession numbers are given; the branch lengths are drawn proportionally to the amount of changes (scale bar).
Minimum infection rate
To evaluate the infection rate of the collected mosquitoes, the minimum infection rate (MIR) of each mosquito species was calculated. If a mosquito pool was positive for trypanosomatid DNA, it was assumed that the pool contained at least one positive individual. Therefore, MIR (percentage) was calculated as follows:
Results
A total of 29,975 mosquitoes, belonging to 19 species and five genera, were collected in Vienna and Eastern Austria in the years 2014 and 2015 (S1 Fig).
From these, 1680 pools were created using up to 50 mosquito females separated by species, time and site of sampling. A total of 298 (17.7%) mosquito pools were positive for trypanosomatid DNA (S1 Table). Of these, 243 pools (82.1%) belonged to 14 identified mosquito species and forma, whereas 53 pools (17.9%) were of unidentified individuals of the genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus, Culex, and Anopheles. Pools positive for trypanosomatids were of the following mosquito taxa: Ae. cinereus/geminus, Ae. vexans, An. maculipennis complex, An. plumbeus, Cq. richiardii, Cx. pipiens s.l. and Cx. torrentium (unspecified to forma level), Cx. pipiens f. pipiens, Cx. pipiens f. molestus, Cx. pipiens f. pipiens/molestus hybrid, Cx. torrentium, Cx. martinii, Cx. modestus, Oc. geniculatus, and Oc. sticticus.
Trypanosomid parasites were not found in the following 15 species: Anopheles algeriensis, An. claviger, An. hyrcanus, Cs. annulata, Cx. territans, Oc. cantans, Oc. caspius, Oc. cataphylla, Oc. communis, Oc. flavescens, Oc. intrudens, Oc. japonicus, Oc. leucomelas, Oc. rusticus and Uranotaenia unguiculata.
Trypanosomatid parasite diversity
The most common trypanosomatid species found in the tested mosquito pools were trypanosomes belonging to the Trypanosoma theileri/cervi complex (No. of positive pools = 105, which represents 35.5% of all positive pools and 6.3% of all tested pools) and T. culicavium (n = 69; 23.2% / 4.1%), followed by T. avium s.l. (n = 3; 1.0% / 0.2%) and monoxenous species belonging to the genus Crithidia and Herpetomonas (n = 20; 7.0% / 1.3%). A total of three dixenous and four monoxenous trypanosomatid species were identified by the analysis of their SSU (S1 Table and Fig 1). One third of the examined mosquito pools positive for trypanosomatid DNA (n = 98; 33.1%) carried more than one parasite species, as could be seen on the electropherogram where different peaks superimposed on each other. The mosquito species with the highest diversity of different trypanosomatid parasites was Cq. richiardii, in which we found the T. theileri complex and all four detected species of monoxenous trypanosomatids (S1 Table). The trypanosome species T. culicavium was only detected in mosquitoes of the genus Culex and the species T. avium s.l. was found only in 2014. Since the whole bodies of mosquitoes were used in pools, and no dissection and microscopy was performed, it was not possible to assert competent vector status of trypanosomes on the sampled mosquito species.
The BLAST search of the GenBank database presented a vast majority of our received sequences with 100% sequence identity to previously published sequences of three trypanosomes, T. culicavium (MG255959), T. avium s.l. (one genotype, MG255950) and the T. theileri/cervi complex (five genotypes, MG255951, MG255952, MG255953, MG255954, MG255958), and three crithidia species, Crithidia fasciculata (MG255955), C. brevicula (MG255956), and C. pragensis (MG255957). The only exception is one single sequence, TR_SU106 (MG255960), found in Cq. richiardii, which represents a potential new species of the genus Herpetomonas. The position on the phylogenetic tree is unstable, with about 95% sequence identity (identities = 1977/2080, 95%; gaps = 47/2080, 2%) to H. modestus (KC709668) (Fig 1).
Trypanosomatid prevalence
In 2014, a total of 10,575 individual mosquitoes, consisting of 830 pools, were collected. Of these, 110 pools (13.3%) of six identified mosquito species were positive for trypanosomatids (S2 Table). The most commonly collected mosquito in 2014 was Ae. vexans with 4420 individuals (41.2%), this mosquito also yielded the highest number of positive pools (n = 33) and the second highest prevalence in the identified mosquito species (21.7%; S2 Table). The highest prevalence of trypanosomatids (23.8%) was found in Oc. sticticus.
In 2014, individual genetic determination of 2,114 Cx. pipiens s.l. / torrentium mosquitoes in 325 pools revealed that 91.7% (1939 individuals in 221 pools) belonged to the subspecies Cx. pipiens f. pipiens, 2.0% (n = 43; 26 pools) to Cx. pipiens f. molestus, 3.6% (n = 76; 45 pools) to hybrids of the former, and 2.7% (n = 56; 33 pools) to Cx. torrentium. Altogether trypanosomatid DNA was detected in 25 pools (7.7%) (S1 and S2 Tables). The majority of positives were found in pools of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens (21 pools positive); only one pool of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens/molestus hybrids and three of Cx. torrentium were positive (Table 1).
In 2015, nearly twice as many mosquitoes (n = 19,400) were collected, compared to 2014 (n = 10,575). These were divided into 850 pools with a total of 188 pools (22.1%) positive for trypanosomatid DNA (S2 Table). Mosquito species composition did significantly [42] differ between the years, with a much higher proportion of Cq. richiardii (16%), Cx. pipiens s.l. / torrentium (29.5%) and Cx. martinii (6.6%) compared to 2014, whereas the proportion of Ae. vexans and Oc. sticticus was much lower compare to 2014 (S2 Table). Out of the 188 DNA positive pools, 163 (86.7%) belonged to ten identified mosquito species and 25 (13.3%) pools were of unidentified mosquitoes of the genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus, Anopheles, and Culex. The majority of positives (n = 71; 24.4%) were found in Cx. pipiens s.l. / torrentium pools with MIR reaching almost 1%. The highest proportion of trypanosomatid DNA was found in pools of Aedes vexans (28.4%; MIR = 1.1%) and Oc. sticticus (32.3%; MIR = 2.1%). Both Aedes species carried predominantly T. theileri/cervi (S1 Table).
Trypanosomatid prevalence expressed by minimum infection rate (MIR)
The minimum infection rate varied between the mosquito species and between the years (S2 Table and Table 1, Figs 2 and 3). The average total MIR (both years and all sampling events) was 0.99%, with the highest prevalence for Oc. geniculatus (3.9%), An. maculipennis (1.8%), and An. plumbeus (1.7%) (S1 Table). The overall highest MIR was found in Cx. martinii (3.0%) in 2014 and Oc. geniculatus (16.7%) in 2015 (S2 Table); however the calculated prevalence could be overestimated due to generally low number of tested pools. In 2014, when morphologically undistinguishable mosquitoes of the Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium were identified genetically, it was possible to determine the MIR in the different biotypes comprising this complex (Table 1). Here, Cx. torrentium presented with the highest MIR (5.4%), followed by Cx. pipiens f. pipiens/molestus hybrids (1.3%) and Cx. pipiens f. pipiens (1.1%). No parasite DNA was found in Cx. pipiens f. molestus.
Monthly changes and differences between 2014 and 2015
The total number and proportion of positive pools in 2014 and 2015 (as well as MIR) was highest in early and mid-summer in both years and became gradually less towards autumn (Fig 2). This is also evident for T. theileri/cervi, where the numbers (2014) and pool positivity (2015) was highest in June and was gradually tapering off towards October. The trypanosome species T. avium was only found in 2014, and that year, only in late spring and early summer (May/June). Compared to mammalian trypanosome T. theileri/cervi, avian T. culicavium showed the opposite trend; total numbers, pool positivity and MIR increase towards late summer and were highest in August in both years (Figs 2 and 3).
Discussion
This is the first large scale study of trypanosomatid flagellates in mosquitoes with emphasis on Austria. Our results are of special interest, because the used genetic identification of the Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. torrentium mosquito species enabled the determination of trypanosomatid parasites in the morphologically undistinguishable species, biotypes and their hybrids of this complex for the first time. Since we used pools of whole body insects and did not perform microdissections, microscopy or experimental infections, we cannot assert any vector competence and/or host specificity in any of the examined mosquitoes for the detected trypanosome species. However, our results are non-the-less valuable in providing an overview of the dixenous as well as monoxenous trypanosomatid species present in Central Europe.
Trypanosomatid diversity and prevalence
The trypanosomatid parasites we found in mosquitoes belonged to three trypanosome species (T. theileri complex, T. culicavium, and less frequently T. avium s.l.) and four monoxenous insect species, three of the genus Crithidia (C. fasciculata and C. brevis were the most frequent, whereas C. pragensis was found in one pool only) and one of the genus Herpetomonas (found in one mosquito pool only). In the previous study performed in neighboring Czechia [16], different bloodsucking dipterans (Culex spp., Simuliidae, and Hippoboscidae) were examined for trypanosomatids. T. culicavium, T. avium, and Crithidia brevicula were detected in both Cx. pipiens and Cx. modestus, with overall trypanosomatid prevalence 8.2% and 5.1% in Cx. pipiens and Cx. modestus, respectively. In Czechia, the prevalence of Trypanosoma culicavium in Cx. pipiens s.l. and Cx. modestus varies between 0.3% and 5.4% and between 0.05% and 1.4%, respectively [16, 47]. Similar prevalence of T. culicavium was detected in Culex mosquitoes during our study, ranging from 1 to 3%. Despite the fact that we examined a wider range of mosquito species and a larger amount of individuals than these previous studies in Czechia [16, 47], we only found a small number of T. avium s.l. positives (only in May and June 2014). Trypanosoma avium s.l. is a common parasite in various avian orders worldwide and the prevalence in birds in Europe ranges between 1 to 87.2% [43, 38, 61–63]. Although these parasites have not been studied in Austria in any detail before, a similar range of prevalence would be expected for local birds and the relatively low prevalence we observed in the mosquitoes is surprising. The habitat where the sampling takes place has a great impact on mosquito diversity [64] and the parasites they carry, which is influenced by the available vertebrate host species [16], it is therefore possible that our sampling locations had only low numbers of bird species carrying T. avium sensu lato.
The parasites T. theileri, T. cervi, T. cf. cervi belong to a complex of species which cannot be resolved using the SSU gene and it is therefore not possible to determine the exact taxonomy of the parasites belonging to this complex found in this study. Further research on the collected material will take more genes into account to resolve this ambiguity.
Aedes vexans is a mammalophilic mosquito, and previous studies have shown that wild game animals like red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) are commonly bitten [65, 66]. In a study in Switzerland, Ae. vexans blood meals taken from wild game animals were the second most common after blood meals from cattle, with 18.25% of all examined blood meals from red deer, and 5.1% from roe deer [66]. Börstler et al. [65] reported a very similar result for Ae. vexans in their study on host preferences of different mosquito species in Germany. The information concerning the occurrence of Trypanosoma theileri/cervi in wild animals, especially cervids, in Central Europe is very limited. The presence of these parasites in Germany and Poland [67, 68] is supported by two trypanosome sequences available in GenBank and obtained from a red deer (Cervus elaphus) and fallow deer (Dama dama) sampled in Poland. Our frequent findings of T. theileri/cervi in Austrian mosquitoes (preferably in the genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus and Coquillettidia) is no evidence for the involvement of these mosquitoes in the transmission cycle of the parasite; on the other hand, it proves the abundance of the trypanosomes in the vertebrate hosts (probably game ungulates) in the studied areas.
Monoxenous trypanosomatids infect a broad range of insects, including those of the order Diptera. Due to their limited impact on human and animal health, monoxenous trypanosomatids have received only little attention. Based on PCR screening, three species of the genus Crithidia, common parasites of the insect alimentary canal, were detected in mosquito pools. Whereas C. fasciculata, a well-known laboratory model, infects many mosquito species [69], Crithidia brevicula is known mainly from true heteropteran bugs [66, 70]. In Czechia, however, the parasite was found in Culex mosquitoes [16]. While the two previous species have been found in mosquitoes repeatedly, the third Crithidia species, C. pragensis, was found only in one pool of Cq. richiardii. The parasite species was recently described in neighboring Czechia [71] from a brachyceran fly Cordilura albipes (Scatophagidae) and our finding therefore extends the possible host spectrum and area of the distribution.
We did not find any Paratrypanosoma parasites, repeatedly reported from mosquitoes in the neighboring Czechia [16, 25], but also in the USA [72]. However, in one pool of Cq. richiardii we have found an unknown species of Herpetomonas. This parasite genus is predominately found in dipterans, mainly in brachyceran flies [65], however several studies demonstrated the occurrence of Herpetomonas parasites in blood sucking nematoceran insects, specifically in biting midges [17, 18].
One third of all positive mosquito pools examined in this study carried a mix of either two or more different trypanosomatid species. Detecting mixes in this study is a by-product of examining pools of mosquitoes instead of looking at individuals, although the presence of several species, visible as double peaks on the chromatogram, has been found in other studies examining other haematozoa (avian malaria parasites) even in single mosquitoes [73].
Seasonal changes
During both years, the total trypanosomatid pool prevalence (%) and MIR was highest in the mid of summer and decreased towards autumn. Differences between the years can be explained by climatic differences, since the period April to September in the year 2014 was on average cooler with more precipitation than the same period in 2015. This had an impact on which mosquito species and the numbers of individuals were caught, which was reported in a previous paper [64]. The differences in seasonality between the two dominant trypanosome species are more remarkable. Compared to mammalian T. theileri/cervi, the total numbers, prevalence (%) and MIR of avian T. culicavium appeared to increase towards autumn. These noticeable differences can be explained by the different host and vector preferences of both mentioned trypanosomes. While avian T. culicavium develops in mosquitoes of the genus Culex, mammalian T. theileri/cervi is found mainly in mosquitoes of the genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus and Coquillettidia. Unlike monoxenous trypanosomatids, dixenous trypanosomes infect mosquitoes when sucking blood, and the different behavior and seasonality of various mosquito species/genera may also result in different seasonality and occurrence of transmitted parasites.
Trypanosoma avium was only detected in two months (May and June) in 2014, and total numbers, prevalence (%) and MIR were higher in May. It is known that temperature has an impact on the development of trypanosomes in invertebrate hosts. Experiments performed on T. avium in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes showed that higher temperatures were detrimental for parasite development and the optimal temperature was around 20 °C. This might be the reason we only observed these parasites during late spring/early summer in 2014. The temperature requirements might be similar for the development of T. theileri/cervi, although no studies have been performed on this parasite and the only report of seasonal changes in prevalence of T. theileri in the Northern hemisphere noted an increase in the infection rate of domestic cattle in the state of New York from May to September [74]. In contrast to our detected vector-borne trypanosomes, the monoxenous Crithidia spp. appeared evenly distributed over the year, probably due to the horizontal transmission between mosquito hosts via contamination of sugar food sources by parasites.
Trypanosomatid parasites in mosquitoes of the Cx. pipiens s.l. / Cx. torrentium
The second most common mosquitoes caught in this study were species belonging to the morphologically indistinguishable Cx. pipiens s.l. and Cx. torrentium. During the previous study, these taxa, sampled in 2014, were identified genetically [54] and this provided us with an opportunity to determine trypanosomatid diversity and prevalence in these Culex mosquitoes. The most common trypanosome species we detected in this species complex was T. culicavium. On the other hand, Trypanosoma avium s.l., Crithidia brevicula and C. fasciculata were found only in Cx. pipiens f. pipiens. During our sampling, the most common mosquito of this species group caught was Cx. pipiens f. pipiens and subsequently, the largest total number of trypanosomatids as well as the largest proportion of positive pools was found in this biotype. However, when comparing the MIR of the different biotypes and the hybrids in the species complex, differences are evident. Culex torrentium showed the highest MIR, followed by the Cx. pipiens f. pipiens/molestus hybrids, while the MIR for Cx. pipiens was lowest and no trypanosomatids were detected in Cx. pipiens f. molestus. It is unclear if these differences could be explained by the much lower sample size of Cx. pipiens f. molestus, Cx. torrentium and hybrids or if these mosquitoes in general bite birds infected with T. culicavium more frequently and therefore have a higher chance of acquiring these parasites.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Sampling sites for mosquitoes in Eastern Austria during the years 2013−2015.
The close-up provides an overview of the city of Vienna where sampling sites were densest. Sites positive for trypanosomatid parasites are marked by stars, negative sites are marked by triangles. The map was constructed using our data and the software: ArcGIS 10.1 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA, https://www.esri.com).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196052.s001
(TIF)
S1 Table. Overall trypanosomatid prevalence (calculated as a minimum infection rate, MIR), pool positivity, and parasite diversity found in mosquitoes sampled in Vienna and Eastern Austria (2014 and 2015).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196052.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Occurrence of trypanosomatid DNA in pools of mosquito species collected in Vienna and Eastern Austria (2014 and 2015).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196052.s003
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank all citizen scientists who helped with mosquito sampling within this study. This research was funded by the ERA-Net BiodivERsA, with the national funders FWF I-1437, ANR-13-EBID-0007-01 and DFG BiodivERsA KL 2087/6-1 as part of the 2012–13 BiodivERsA call for research proposals as well as by ERD Funds, project CePaViP (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000759).
References
- 1. Maslov DA, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V, Lukeš J. Diversity and phylogeny of insect trypanosomatids: all that is hidden shall be revealed. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(1):43–52. pmid:23246083
- 2. Simpson AG, Stevens JR, Lukeš J. The evolution and diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(4):168–74. pmid:16504583
- 3. Kaufer A, Ellis J, Stark D, Barratt J. The evolution of trypanosomatid taxonomy. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:287. pmid:28595622
- 4. Lukeš J, Skalický T, Týč J, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V. Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(2):115–22. pmid:24893339
- 5. Poinar G Jr, Poinar R. Evidence of vector-borne disease of early cretaceous reptiles. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004;4(4):281–4. pmid:15682513
- 6. Wallace FG. The trypanosomatid parasites of insects and arachnids. Exp Parasitol. 1966;18(1):124–93. pmid:5325636
- 7. Maslov DA, Lukeš J, Jirků M, Simpson L. Phylogeny of trypanosomes as inferred from the small and large subunit rRNAs: implications for the evolution of parasitism in the trypanosomatid protozoa. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;75(2):197–205. pmid:8992318
- 8. Svobodová M, Zídková L, Čepička I, Oborník M, Lukeš J, Votýpka J. Sergeia podlipaevi gen. nov., sp nov (Trypanosomatidae, Kinetoplastida), a parasite of biting midges (Ceratopogonidae, Diptera). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:423–32. pmid:17267991
- 9. Teixeira MM, Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Santos MA, Takata CS, Campaner M, et al. Phylogenetic validation of the genera Angomonas and Strigomonas of trypanosomatids harboring bacterial endosymbionts with the description of new species of trypanosomatids and of proteobacterial symbionts. Protist. 2011;162(3):503–24. pmid:21420905
- 10. Votýpka J, Kostygov AY, Kraeva N, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Tesařová M, Grybchuk D, et al. Kentomonas gen. n., a new genus of endosymbiont-containing Trypanosomatids of Strigomonadinae subfam. n. Protist. 2014;165(6):825–38. pmid:25460233
- 11. Barratt J, Kaufer A, Peters B, Craig D, Lawrence A, Roberts T, et al. Isolation of novel Trypanosomatid, Zelonia australiensis sp nov (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) provides support for a Gondwanan origin of dixenous parasitism in the Leishmaniinae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1).
- 12. Garnham P. Some natural protozoal parasites of mosquitoes with special reference to Crithidia. Trans I Int Conf Insect Pathology & Biol Control. 1958:287–94.
- 13. Wallace F. Flagellate parasites of mosquitoes with special reference to Crithidia fasciculata Leger, 1902. J Parasitol. 1943:196–205.
- 14. Votýpka J, Ray DS, Lukeš J. Crithidia fasciculata: a test for genetic exchange. Exp Parasitol. 2001;99(2):104–7. pmid:11748964
- 15. Fampa PC, Corrêa-da-Silva MS, Lima DC, Oliveira SM, Motta MCM, Saraiva EM. Interaction of insect trypanosomatids with mosquitoes, sand fly and the respective insect cell lines. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33(10):1019–26. pmid:13129523
- 16. Svobodová M, Volf P, Votýpka J. Trypanosomatids in ornithophilic bloodsucking Diptera. Med Vet Entomol. 2015;29(4):444–7. pmid:26211924
- 17. Podlipaev S, Votýpka J, Jirků M, Svobodova M, Lukeš J. Herpetomonas ztiplika n. sp (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae): A parasite of the blood-sucking biting midge Culicoides kibunensis Tokunaga, 1937 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J Parasitol. 2004;90:342–7. pmid:15165057
- 18. Zídková L, Cepicka I, Votýpka J, Svobodová M. Herpetomonas trimorpha sp. nov. (Trypanosomatidae, Kinetoplastida), a parasite of the biting midge Culicoides truncorum (Ceratopogonidae, Diptera). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60(9):2236–46.
- 19. d’Avila-Levy CM, Boucinha C, Kostygov A, Santos HLC, Morelli KA, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, et al. Exploring the environmental diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates in the high-throughput DNA sequencing era. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(8):956–65. pmid:26602872
- 20. Votýpka J, d’Avila-Levy CM, Grellier P, Maslov DA, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. New approaches to systematics of Trypanosomatidae: criteria for taxonomic (re) description. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31(10):460–9. pmid:26433249
- 21. Kostygov AY, Dobáková E, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Váhala D, Maslov DA, Votýpka J, et al. Novel trypanosomatid-bacterium association: evolution of endosymbiosis in action. MBio. 2016;7(2):e01985–15. pmid:26980834
- 22. Hamilton PT, Votýpka J, Dostálová A, Yurchenko V, Bird NH, Lukeš J, et al. Infection dynamics and immune response in a newly described Drosophila-trypanosomatid association. MBio. 2015;6(5):e01356–15. pmid:26374124
- 23. Kozminsky E, Kraeva N, Ishemgulova A, Dobáková E, Lukeš J, Kment P, et al. Host-specificity of monoxenous trypanosomatids: statistical analysis of the distribution and transmission patterns of the parasites from neotropical Heteroptera. Protist. 2015;166(5):551–68. pmid:26466163
- 24. Votýpka J, Maslov DA, Yurchenko V, Jirků M, Kment P, Lun Z-R, et al. Probing into the diversity of trypanosomatid flagellates parasitizing insect hosts in South-West China reveals both endemism and global dispersal. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54(1):243–53. pmid:19835965
- 25. Flegontov P, Votýpka J, Skalický T, Logacheva MD, Penin AA, Tanifuji G, et al. Paratrypanosoma is a novel early-branching trypanosomatid. Curr Biol. 2013;23(18):1787–93. pmid:24012313
- 26. Fernandes AP, Nelson K, Beverley SM. Evolution of nuclear ribosomal-RNAS in kinetoplastid protozoa—perspectives on the age and origins of parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(24):11608–12. pmid:8265597
- 27. Losos GJ, Ikede B. Review of pathology of diseases in domestic and laboratory animals caused by Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax, T. brucei, T. rhodesiense and T. gambiense.Vet Pathol. 1972;9(1suppl):1–79.
- 28. Van den Ingh T, Zwart D, Van Miert A, Schotman A. Clinico-pathological and pathomorphological observations in Trypanosoma vivax infection cattle. Vet Parasitol. 1976;2(3):237–50.
- 29.
Buguet A, Cespuglio R, Bouteille B. African sleeping sickness. Sleep med: Springer; 2015. p. 159–65.
- 30. Hedley L, Fink D, Sparkes D, Chiodini PL. African sleeping sickness. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016;77(Sup10):C157–C60.
- 31. Rassi A Jr, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1388–402. pmid:20399979
- 32. Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Chagas disease: a Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop. 2010;115(1–2):14–21. pmid:19932071
- 33. Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Losev A, Kostygov AY, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. High prevalence of trypanosome co-infections in freshwater fishes. Folia Parasitol. 2014;61:495–504. pmid:25651690
- 34. Svobodová M, Weidinger K, Peške L, Volf P, Votýpka J, Voříšek P. Trypanosomes and haemosporidia in the buzzard (Buteo buteo) and sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus): factors affecting the prevalence of parasites. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(2):551–60. pmid:25403377
- 35. Votýpka J, Lukeš J, Oborník M. Phylogenetic relationship of Trypanosoma corvi with other avian trypanosomes. Acta Protozool. 2004;43:225–31.
- 36. Votýpka J, Oborník M, Volf P, Svobodová M, Lukeš J. Trypanosoma avium of raptors (Falconiformes): phylogeny and identification of vectors. Parasitology. 2002;125:253–63. pmid:12358422
- 37. Votýpka J, Svobodová M. Trypanosoma avium: experimental transmission from black flies to canaries. Parasitol Res. 2004;92(2):147–51. pmid:14652745
- 38. Zídková L, Čepička I, Szabová J, Svobodová M. Biodiversity of avian trypanosomes. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12.
- 39. Böse R, Friedhoff K, Olbrich S, Büscher G, Domeyer I. Transmission of Trypanosoma theileri to cattle by Tabanidae. Parasitol Res. 1987;73(5):421–4. pmid:3658973
- 40.
Hoare CA. The trypanosomes of mammals. Oxford: BlackwellScientific Publications; 1972.
- 41. Rodrigues A, Paiva F, Campaner M, Stevens J, Noyes H, Teixeira M. Phylogeny of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri and related trypanosomes reveals lineages of isolates associated with artiodactyl hosts diverging on SSU and ITS ribosomal sequences. Parasitology. 2006;132(02):215–24.
- 42. Sehgal RN, Jones HI, Smith TB. Host specificity and incidence of Trypanosoma in some African rainforest birds: a molecular approach. Mol Ecol. 2001;10(9):2319–27. pmid:11555273
- 43. Šlapeta J, Morin-Adeline V, Thompson P, McDonell D, Shiels M, Gilchrist K, et al. Intercontinental distribution of a new trypanosome species from Australian endemic Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia). Parasitology. 2016;143(8):1012–25. pmid:27001623
- 44. Bennett GF. On the specificity and transmission of some avian trypanosomes. Can J Zool. 1961;39(1):17–33.
- 45. Baker J. Studies on Trypanosoma avium Danilewsky 1885 II. Transmission by Ornithomyia avicularia L. Parasitology. 1956;46(3–4):321–34. pmid:13378882
- 46. Svobodová M, Dolnik OV, Čepička I, Rádrová J. Biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of avian trypanosomes. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):224. pmid:28482865
- 47. Votýpka J, Szabová J, Rádrová J, Zídková L, Svobodová M. Trypanosoma culicavium sp nov., an avian trypanosome transmitted by Culex mosquitoes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:745–54. pmid:21515704
- 48. Bennett GF. Development of trypanosomes of the T. avium complex in the invertebrate host. Can J Zool. 1970;48(5):945–57. pmid:5471784
- 49. Volf P, Hajmova M, Sádlová J, Votýpka J. Blocked stomodeal valve of the insect vector: similar mechanism of transmission in two trypanosomatid models. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34(11):1221–7. pmid:15491584
- 50. Bennett GF. Trypanosoma avium Danilewsky in the avian host. Can J Zool. 1970;48(4):803–7.
- 51. Stabler RM, Holt PA, Kitzmiller NJ. Trypanosoma avium in the blood and bone marrow from 677 Colorado birds. J Parasitol. 1966:1141–4. pmid:5926338
- 52. Molyneux D, Cooper J, Smith W. Studies on the pathology of an avian trypanosome (T. bouffardi) infection in experimentally infected canaries. Parasitology. 1983;87(01):49–54.
- 53.
Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon M, Dahl C. Mosquitoes and their control. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
- 54. Zittra C, Flechl E, Kothmayer M, Vitecek S, Rossiter H, Zechmeister T. Ecological characterization and molecular differentiation of Culex pipiens complex taxa and Culex torrentium in eastern Austria. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9.
- 55. Seward EA, Votýpka J, Kment P, Lukeš J, Kelly S. Description of Phytomonas oxycareni n. sp. from the salivary glands of Oxycarenus lavaterae. Protist. 2017;168(1):71–9. pmid:28043008
- 56. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–9. pmid:22543367
- 57. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer ELL. Kalign—an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2005;6.
- 58. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–42. pmid:22357727
- 59. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Hordijk W, Lefort V, Gascuel O. PhyML: Fast and Accurate Phylogeny Reconstruction by Maximum Likelihood. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9(3):384–5.
- 60. Posada D, Crandall KA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817–8. pmid:9918953
- 61. Holmstad PR, Anwar A, Iezhova T, Skorping A. Standard sampling techniques underestimate prevalence of avian hematozoa in willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus). J Wildl Dis. 2003;39(2):354–8. pmid:12910763
- 62. Merino S, Potti J. High prevalence of hematozoa in nestlings of a passerine species, the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Auk. 1995;112(4):1041–3.
- 63. Shurulinkov P, Ilieva M. Spatial and temporal differences in the blood parasite fauna of passerine birds during the spring migration in Bulgaria. Parasit Res. 2009;104(6):1453.
- 64. Zittra C, Vitecek S, Obwaller AG, Rossiter H, Eigner B, Zechmeister T, et al. Landscape structure affects distribution of potential disease vectors (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):205. pmid:28441957
- 65. Börstler J, Jöst H, Garms R, Krüger A, Tannich E, Becker N. Host-feeding patterns of mosquitoes in Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9.
- 66. Schonenberger AC, Wagner S, Tuten HC, Schaffner F, Torgerson P, Furrer S, et al. Host preferences in host-seeking and blood-fed mosquitoes in Switzerland. Med Vet Entomol. 2016;30(1):39–52. pmid:26685926
- 67. Friedhoff K, Petrich J, Hoffmann M, Büscher G. Trypanosomes in cervidae in Germany. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984;256(3):286–7. pmid:6730781
- 68. Wita I, Kingston N. Trypanosoma cervi in red deer, Cervus elaphus, in Poland. Acta Parasitol. 1999;44:93–8.
- 69.
Podlipaev S. [Catalogue of world fauna of Trypanosomatidae (Protozoa)]. Proc Zool Inst, Leningrad. 1990:1–178. (in Russian)
- 70. Kostygov AY, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Malysheva MN, Frolov AO, Yurchenko V. Molecular revision of the genus Wallaceina. Protist. 2014;165(5):594–604. pmid:25113831
- 71. Yurchenko V, Votýpka J, Tesarová M, Klepetková H, Kraeva N, Jirků M, et al. Ultrastructure and molecular phylogeny of four new species of monoxenous trypanosomatids from flies (Diptera: Brachycera) with redefinition of the genus Wallaceina. Folia Parasitol. 2014;61(2):97. pmid:24822316
- 72. Van Dyken M, Bolling BG, Moore CG, Blair CD, Beaty BJ, Black WC, et al. Molecular evidence for trypanosomatids in Culex mosquitoes collected during a West Nile virus survey. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36(9):1015–23. pmid:16782103
- 73. Flegontov P, Butenko A, Firsov S, Kraeva N, Eliáš M, Field MC, et al. Genome of Leptomonas pyrrhocoris: a high-quality reference for monoxenous trypanosomatids and new insights into evolution of Leishmania. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23704. pmid:27021793
- 74. Schlafer D. Trypanosoma theileri: a literature review and report of incidence in New York cattle. Cornell Vet. 1979;69(4):411–25. pmid:527346