Abstract
Neoliberal capitalism intensified the social fragmentation, which resulted in the upswing of heterogeneous communities without a unifying meta-language that was liberal universalism of citizenship. Our society shows “paralogical” traits and paralogy reverberates in the new populist policy I call metapopulism (Trump, Putin, etc.)-witness their inconsistencies. Metapopulism establishes unifying principles as a substitute of liberal universalism. These are allegory and the Real. An allegorical signifier (“patriotism” etc.), which is separated from the signified (the meaning), is a common representation of heterogeneous communities and simultaneously maintains their paralogy. The Real appears as the signifier that is excluded from “correct” liberal discourse and promises to enhance the experience of a system’s failures by attributing a social meaning to it (sublimation). These principles work on the condition that their promises are permanently thwarted and deferred, which is their spectrality. However, another type of unification may be feasible. It is a unifying discourse and practise that is grounded in a specific position of the “precariat” as the hegemonical class as formed by neoliberal capitalism (the Lukacsian concept). Here, a unification is borne by the praxis of sublimation.
References
Barassi, Veronica. Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles Against Digital Capitalism. Routledge, 2015.10.4324/9781315870991Search in Google Scholar
Filipov, David. “Putin can’t seem to find a ‘national idea’ for Russians, so he’s proposing a law to do it.” The Washington Post, 5 November 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-cant-seem-to-find-a-national-ideafor-russians-so-hes-proposing-a-law-to-do-it/2016/11/05/1fba53d2-a1d5-11e6-8864-6f892cad0865_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.35ae8ff590eb/.Search in Google Scholar
Foster, Belamy. “Neofascism in the White House.” Monthly Review, April 1, 2017, https://monthlyreview.org/2017/04/01/neofascism-in-the-white-house/10.14452/MR-068-11-2017-04_1Search in Google Scholar
Hauser, Michael. “Metapopulism in-between democracy and populism. Transformations of Laclau’s concept of populism with Trump and Putin.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, 2018, pp. 68-87, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2018.1455599/.10.1080/1600910X.2018.1455599/Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Culture Change. Wiley-Blackwell, 1990Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W.F. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art, vol. I. Trans. T. M. Knox. Clarendon Press, 1975.10.1093/actrade/9780198244998.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham University Press, 1991.10.1215/9780822378419Search in Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. Verso, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Lukács, George. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. MIT Press, 1971.Search in Google Scholar
Lütjen, Torben. “As people ‛sort’ themselves, consequences for democracy.” Journal Sentinel, 25 December 2012, http://archive.jsonline.com/news/opinion/as-people-sort-themselves-consequences-for-democracy-dq818lu-184769081.html/Search in Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, 1984.10.2307/1772278Search in Google Scholar
Parenti, Christian. “Listening to Trump.” Jacobin Magazin, 22 November 2016, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/11/trump-speeches-populism-war-economics-election/.Search in Google Scholar
Pomerantsev, Peter. “The Hidden Author of Putinism.” The Atlantic, 7 November 2014, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/hidden-author-putinism-russia-vladislav-surkov/382489/Search in Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity.” Praxis International, vol. 4, no.1, 1984, pp. 32-44.Search in Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury, 2011.10.5040/9781849664554Search in Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. “New Populist Party in Western Europe.” West European Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, 1995, pp. 34-51.10.1080/01402389508425056Search in Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. Populism. Open University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Tamás, Gáspár, M. “On Post-fascism: The Degradation of Universal Citizenship.” Boston Review, 1 June 2000, http://bostonreview.net/world/g-m-tam%C3%A1s-post-fascismSearch in Google Scholar
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. Die kulturellen Grundlagen der Gesellschaft. Der Fall der Moderne. Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990.10.1007/978-3-322-87531-0Search in Google Scholar
Toffler, Alvin. Future Shock. Random House, 1970.Search in Google Scholar
Traverso, Enzo. “Trump’s Savage Capitalism: The Nightmare is Real.” World Policy Journal, vol. 34, no.1, 2017, pp. 13-17.10.1215/07402775-3903760Search in Google Scholar
Whitebook, Joel. “Trump’s Method, Our Madness.” The New York Times, 20 March 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/opinion/trumps-method-our-madness.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSourc=e=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-rightregion&_r=1Search in Google Scholar
Zima, Peter V. Modern/Postmodern. Society, Philosophy, Literature. Continuum, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Verso, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. Verso, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
© by Michael Hauser, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
