skip to main content
research-article

On Protocols for Monotone Feasible Interpolation

Published:26 June 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Dag-like communication protocols, a generalization of the classical tree-like communication protocols, are useful objects in the realm of proof complexity (most importantly for monotone feasible interpolation) and circuit complexity. We consider three kinds of protocols in this article (d is the degree of a protocol):

IEQ-d-dags: feasible sets of these protocols are described by inequality which means that the feasible sets are combinatorial triangles; these protocols are also called triangle-dags in the literature,

EQ-d-dags: feasible sets are described by equality, and

c-IEQ-d-dags: feasible sets are described by a conjunction of c inequalities.

Garg, Göös, Kamath, and Sokolov (Theory of Computing, 2020) mentioned all these protocols, and they noted that EQ-d-dags are a special case of c-IEQ-d-dags. The exact relationship between these types of protocols is unclear.

As our main contribution, we prove the following statement: EQ-2-dags can efficiently simulate c-IEQ-d-dags when c and d are constants. This implies that EQ-2-dags are at least as strong as IEQ-d-dags and that EQ-2-dags have the same strength as c-IEQ-d-dags for c ≥ 2 (because 2-IEQ-2-dags can trivially simulate EQ-2-dags).

Hrubeš and Pudlák (Information Processing Letters, 2018) proved that IEQ-d-dags over the monotone Karchmer-Wigderson relation are equivalent to monotone real circuits which implies that we have exponential lower bounds for these protocols. Lower bounds for EQ-2-dags would directly imply lower bounds for the proof system R(LIN).

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Beame Paul, Pitassi Toniann, and Segerlind Nathan. 2007. Lower bounds for Lovász–Schrijver systems and beyond follow from multiparty communication complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing 37, 3 (2007), 845869. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Oliveira Mateus de Oliveira and Pudlák Pavel. 2019. Representations of monotone boolean functions by linear programs. ACM Transactions on Computing Theory 11, 4 (2019), 22:1–22:31. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Rezende Susanna F. de, Göös Mika, and Robere Robert. 2022. Guest column: Proofs, circuits, and communication. SIGACT News 53, 1 (2022), 5982. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Garg Ankit, Göös Mika, Kamath Pritish, and Sokolov Dmitry. 2020. Monotone circuit lower bounds from resolution. Theory of Computing 16, 13 (2020), 1--30. https://theoryofcomputing.org/articles/v016a013/v016a013.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Goldmann Mikael and Håstad Johan. 1992. A simple lower bound for monotone clique using a communication game. Information Processing Letters 41, 4 (1992), 221226. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Göös Mika, Kamath Pritish, Robere Robert, and Sokolov Dmitry. 2019. Adventures in monotone complexity and TFNP. In Proceedings of the 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, Blum Avrim (Ed.), Vol. 124. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 38:1–38:19. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Göös Mika and Pitassi Toniann. 2018. Communication lower bounds via critical block sensitivity. SIAM Journal on Computing 47, 5 (2018), 17781806. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Haken Armin and Cook Stephen A.. 1999. An exponential lower bound for the size of monotone real circuits. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 58, 2 (1999), 326335. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Hrubeš Pavel and Pudlák Pavel. 2018. A note on monotone real circuits. Information Processing Letters 131, 3 (2018), 1519. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020019017301965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Itsykson Dmitry and Sokolov Dmitry. 2020. Resolution over linear equations modulo two. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171, 1 (2020), 102722. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Karchmer Mauricio and Wigderson Avi. 1988. Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Simon Janos (Ed.). ACM, 539550. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Krajíček Jan. 2018. Randomized feasible interpolation and monotone circuits with a local oracle. Journal of Mathematical Logic 18, 2 (2018), 1850012. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Krajíček Jan. 1994. Lower bounds to the size of constant-depth propositional proofs. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 1 (1994), 7386. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Krajíček Jan. 1997. Interpolation theorems, lower bounds for proof systems, and independence results for bounded arithmetic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 62, 2 (1997), 457486. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Krajíček Jan. 1998. Interpolation by a game. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44, 4 (1998), 450458. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Krajíček Jan and Oliveira Igor Carboni. 2018. On monotone circuits with local oracles and clique lower bounds. Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science 2018, 1 (2018), 1--18. http://cjtcs.cs.uchicago.edu/articles/2018/1/cj18-01.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Krajíček Jan. 2019. Proof Complexity. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Pitassi Toniann and Robere Robert. 2017. Strongly exponential lower bounds for monotone computation. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, Hatami Hamed, McKenzie Pierre, and King Valerie (Eds.). ACM, 12461255. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Pudlák Pavel. 1997. Lower bounds for resolution and cutting plane proofs and monotone computations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 62, 3 (1997), 981998. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Pudlák Pavel. 2010. On extracting computations from propositional proofs (a survey). In Proceedings of the IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, Lodaya Kamal and Mahajan Meena (Eds.), Vol. 8. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 3041. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Pudlák Pavel and Sgall Jiří. 1996. Algebraic models of computation and interpolation for algebraic proof systems. In Proceedings of the DIMACS Workshop Proof Complexity and Feasible Arithmetics, (DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science), Beame Paul and Buss Samuel R. (Eds.), Vol. 39. DIMACS/AMS, 279295. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Raz Ran and Tzameret Iddo. 2008. Resolution over linear equations and multilinear proofs. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 155, 3 (2008), 194224. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Raz Ran and Wigderson Avi. 1992. Monotone circuits for matching require linear depth. Journal of the ACM 39, 3 (1992), 736744. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Razborov Alexander A.. 1995. Unprovability of lower bounds on circuit size in certain fragments of bounded arithmetic. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mathematics 59, 1 (1995), 201224. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Razborov Alexander A.. 2016. Guest column: Proof complexity and beyond. SIGACT News 47, 2 (2016), 6686. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Robere Robert, Pitassi Toniann, Rossman Benjamin, and Cook Stephen A.. 2016. Exponential lower bounds for monotone span programs. In Proceedings of the IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Dinur Irit (Ed.). IEEE Computer Society, 406415. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Rosenbloom Arnold. 1997. Monotone real circuits are more powerful than monotone boolean circuits. Information Processing Letters 61, 3 (1997), 161164. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Sokolov Dmitry. 2017. Dag-like communication and its applications. In Proceedings of the 12th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia Computer Science - Theory and ApplicationsLecture Notes in Computer Science, Weil Pascal (Ed.), Vol. 10304. Springer, 294307. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Tardos Éva. 1988. The gap between monotone and non-monotone circuit complexity is exponential. Combinatorica 8, 1 (1988), 141142. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On Protocols for Monotone Feasible Interpolation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
      ACM Transactions on Computation Theory  Volume 15, Issue 1-2
      June 2023
      58 pages
      ISSN:1942-3454
      EISSN:1942-3462
      DOI:10.1145/3605363
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2023
      • Online AM: 15 February 2023
      • Accepted: 7 February 2023
      • Received: 28 May 2021
      Published in toct Volume 15, Issue 1-2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text