Počet záznamů: 1  

The impossibility of sociology as a science: arguments from within the discipline

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0508708
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevThe impossibility of sociology as a science: arguments from within the discipline
    Tvůrce(i) Balon, Jan (FLU-F)
    Holmwood, John (FLU-F)
    Zdroj.dok.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour - ISSN 0021-8308
    Roč. 49, č. 3 (2019), s. 334-347
    Poč.str.14 s.
    Forma vydáníTištěná - P
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.GB - Velká Británie
    Klíč. slovaideology ; interpretive understanding ; positivism ; scientific sociology ; social criticism
    Vědní obor RIVAA - Filosofie a náboženství
    Obor OECDPhilosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
    Způsob publikováníOpen access
    Institucionální podporaFLU-F - RVO:67985955
    UT WOS000483671300005
    EID SCOPUS85064645726
    DOI10.1111/jtsb.12208
    AnotaceThis paper addresses a key moment in the development of sociology when its status as a science was criticised from within by ethnomethodologists (Harvey Sacks and Harold Garfinkel), post-Althusserian Marxists (Barry Hindess) and Michel Foucault. These criticisms seemed to come from different sides, but they converged in arguing their positions from the point of view of a proper conception of science through which mainstream sociology was found wanting. Neither secured its own position and each had a similar legacy of a form of interpretivism hostile both to scientific sociology and its critical project. The paper situates this moment and its legacy where both correspondence and coherence criteria for sociological knowledge claims come to be undermined.
    PracovištěFilosofický ústav
    KontaktKaňková Božena, kankova@flu.cas.cz, Tel: 221 183 360
    Rok sběru2020
    Elektronická adresahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jtsb.12208
Počet záznamů: 1