Počet záznamů: 1  

Risk preferences under acute stress

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0475643
    Druh ASEPJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Zařazení RIVJ - Článek v odborném periodiku
    Poddruh JČlánek ve WOS
    NázevRisk preferences under acute stress
    Tvůrce(i) Cahlíková, Jana (NHU-C) RID
    Cingl, L. (CZ)
    Zdroj.dok.Experimental Economics - ISSN 1386-4157
    Roč. 20, č. 1 (2017), s. 209-236
    Poč.str.28 s.
    Forma vydáníTištěná - P
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Země vyd.NL - Nizozemsko
    Klíč. slovarisk preferences ; risk aversion ; stress
    Vědní obor RIVAH - Ekonomie
    Obor OECDApplied Economics, Econometrics
    CEPSVV 265801/2012 GA MŠMT - Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy
    Institucionální podporaNHU-C - Progres-Q24
    UT WOS000395066600009
    EID SCOPUS84968677310
    DOI10.1007/s10683-016-9482-3
    AnotaceMany important decisions are made under stress and they often involve risky alternatives. There has been ample evidence that stress influences decision making, but still very little is known about whether individual attitudes to risk change with exposure to acute stress. To directly evaluate the causal effect of psychosocial stress on risk attitudes, we adopt an experimental approach in which we randomly expose participants to a stressor in the form of a standard laboratory stress-induction procedure: the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups. Risk preferences are elicited using a multiple price list format that has been previously shown to predict risk-oriented behavior out of the laboratory. Using three different measures (salivary cortisol levels, heart rate and multidimensional mood questionnaire scores), we show that stress was successfully induced on the treatment group. Our main result is that for men, the exposure to a stressor (intention-to-treat effect, ITT) and the exogenously induced psychosocial stress (the average treatment effect on the treated, ATT) significantly increase risk aversion when controlling for their personal characteristics. The estimated treatment difference in certainty equivalents is equivalent to 69 % (ITT) and 89 % (ATT) of the gender-difference in the control group. The effect on women goes in the same direction, but is weaker and insignificant.
    PracovištěNárodohospodářský ústav - CERGE
    KontaktTomáš Pavela, pavela@cerge-ei.cz, Tel.: 224 005 122
    Rok sběru2018
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.