Počet záznamů: 1  

The Common Technical Vocabulary of Perfumery, Dyeing, and Alchemy

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0583344
    Druh ASEPA - Abstrakt
    Zařazení RIVO - Ostatní
    NázevThe Common Technical Vocabulary of Perfumery, Dyeing, and Alchemy
    Tvůrce(i) Coughlin, Sean (FLU-F) ORCID
    AkceA Department of Classics and Ancient History seminar
    Datum konání29.03.2023 - 29.03.2023
    Místo konáníExeter
    ZeměGB - Velká Británie
    Typ akceWRD
    Jazyk dok.eng - angličtina
    Klíč. slovahistory of science ; history of chemistry ; history of perfumery ; history of alchemy ; history of luxury ; stypsis ; experimental philology
    Vědní obor RIVAA - Filosofie a náboženství
    Obor OECDPhilosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
    CEPGM21-30494M GA ČR - Grantová agentura ČR
    Institucionální podporaFLU-F - RVO:67985955
    AnotaceMy narrow aim in the lecture is to suggest that familiar translations of perfumery-related terms are often misleading and cause us to miss connections between perfumery and arts I am calling Venerean, by which I mean the arts of producing (not digging up) luxury goods, especially dyeing clothes, production of artificial precious stones and metals. I focus on the case of stypsis. Stypsis is usually translated into English as ‘thicken’ in perfumery contexts, as ‘mordant’ in dyeing contexts, and as ‘make astringent’ in all others. None of our sources however suggest the process it names has anything to do with thickening. The story of how the name for the process came to be associated with thickening is itself an obscure and interesting story. My aim is to show, however, that what stypsis means in the context of perfumery can be understood in the same way as in contexts of dyeing and the manufacture of artificial precious stones and metals. We will use a little kitchen chemistry to explore what those processes are like. My larger aim is to offer a test case of what we can learn about ancient arts by looking at technical vocabulary used in common across them. This vocabulary is worth looking at because it encodes for both technical processes and theoretical presuppositions. In other words, the vocabulary is reliable (but not exhaustive) evidence for how they thought their methods worked. This can in turn contribute to mapping the phylogeny of natural and applied sciences, and ultimately. I am curious what that phylogeny can teach us about the variation and transmission of both techniques and assumptions about how natural materials can be used.
    PracovištěFilosofický ústav
    KontaktChlumská Simona, chlumska@flu.cas.cz ; Tichá Zuzana, asep@flu.cas.cz Tel: 221 183 360
    Rok sběru2024
Počet záznamů: 1  

  Tyto stránky využívají soubory cookies, které usnadňují jejich prohlížení. Další informace o tom jak používáme cookies.